Just recently, Chinese scientists successfully controlled
pigeons through electronic means. They had successfully controlled the movement of
mice beforehand. I saw a science program on television that showed some researchers sending a mouse through a maze using electronic signals sent directly to the mouse's brain. They were controlling the mouse just like it was a robot.
This reminds me of one of the early panels of
We 3 that showed a group of mice whose body parts had been replaced by tools being remotely controlled to work on building/repairing a piece of machinery.
With the technology these scientists have now, it's easy to imagine a future time in which animals are remotely controlled to do things they wouldn't normally do. For instance, a mouse could be sent down a pipe to patch a leak or something. Would that be slavery if the mouse was naturally unwilling but had to respond because it was being electronically controlled? What if scientists could do this with humans?
If we're uncomfortable with cloning research, how can we be comfortable with mind control research?
Comments
In humans, this raises all manner of interesting questions. If a human's thoughts or actions can be controlled through external manipulation of the brain, then can there be any real argument against the idea that the physical brain is itself the seat of consciousness (as opposed to a soul or what-have-you)? If a human's memory can be altered, then do memories actually mean anything anymore?
Even if we trusted the wetware programmers to be good, pure, just, and ethical, programming desire negates free will. Or does it? Would we be comfortable thinking that animals don't have enough free will to make a difference? Are we certain that there's enough of a gulf between humans and animals that wetware programmers could never negate a human's free will?
I mean, isn't that where this conversation is heading?