I recently finished reading "Watchmen" by Alan Moore. I thought it was an excellent book, but I was rather torn about the ending. I wish to know your thoughts,
**Spoiler**
It talks about how Ozymandias enacts a raw and difficult form of utilitarianism by murdering millions to save billions. It is interesting how the man who symbolizes absolute knowledge is the one that enacts this plan, and Jon, who symbolizes power and understanding, agrees, but Rorschach disagrees with it. The argument could go either way. Utilitarianism is the greatest amount of good, for the greatest amount of people, for the greatest amount of time. What Ozymandias does is save the vast majority and a minute minority's expense. Which makes sense, the good he does outweighs the crime. But Rorschach, who symbolizes some sort of absolute justice or vengeance, disagrees with it on the basis that the fact that Ozymandias committed a crime, and should be punished as payment for all those who were wronged. The problem I have, is when Jon (absolute power and understanding) destroys Rorschach (absolute justice/vengeance). This hints at the struggle between understanding and vengeance, but I disagree with their demolition of justice. Plus I think Rorschach was the most amazing character in the book and should not have died. So my question to you is, what do you think about how the book portrays the struggle previously stated? What do you think about the controversy in general (not specific to the book)? Or is what I am talking about completely wrong, and I should reread the book?
Comments