Amazon Kindle Product PageSony's eReader didn't impress me much...too expensive for a simple reading device. For some reason this thing impresses the hell out of me to the point that I'm inches from clicking the buy button for the $400 device. This seems like the very first eReader device designed for the future of reading.
I think it's the potential that has me absolutely captivated. I just get the feeling that this is eReading done right, that this is the direction our newspapers and blog reading and everything is actually heading. I never put any thought into it before but seeing this device...$400 just doesn't seem too bad for what the device would allow me to do.
Comments
The Kindle does nothing for me. It's battery life is much worse. It is too big with all of those keys. The DRM on the Kindle is much worse than on the Sony Reader. As a web browser, e-ink sucks.
It's got potential, but it's trying to do too much. The one thing that it appears to do much better than the Sony Reader are newspaper subscriptions. If you are really into the newspaper, then I suppose it might be worth it.
"It's so simple you can be a moron and it works." XD
I hear the new Zunes allow you to download podcasts without a computer.
Here is a review of the Kindle. Looks like they will be nickle and diming you to death - and it only supports .txt and Amazon's proprietary format.
I'll give Sony credit with their Reader. It supports several formats that aren't DRMed to death.
Hmmmmm, it can do some nice things. Free internet, jpeg/gif compatible for Manga. Shuffle music on the device, blablabla.
I said "many books" contain images. That includes children's books, comic books, manga and textbooks. You must be pretty desperate if you want to pick a fight over this. I like how you countered my argument by agreeing with it. You listed many books that have images. Too funny.
And a simple google search would have told you that e-ink, including on the Kindle, supports at least 4 levels of grayscale. The newer Viziplex screens support 16 levels.
I like how you said that it looks like it's "either black, or not" and then you went on to say that it supported manga. Did you think that one through at all?
I'm just trying to save you money here. If your priority is not EVDO and RSS/newspapers, then the Sony Reader will do what you want for much less money and supports many more formats. (some formats, such as .LIT, via simple conversion tools) There are also a ton of hacks and conversion tools for the Sony Reader that really open the device up.
The one thing the Sony Reader is very poor at is RSS feeds. It can be done, but the synching is a total pain in the neck. You also have to be in front of a computer to load content onto the Sony Reader.
It's your money... just trying to help.
I am a frequent visitor to the e-ink boards. The people on those boards are rabid e-ink fans, and buy anything that comes out. The overall consensus on those boards is that the Kindle pretty much sucks. This from the ultimate e-ink fanboys. Interpret that however you want.
If you can handle just having wi-fi (and not EVDO), then the Irex Iliad will do everything you want much better (and cheaper) than the Kindle. The Iliad is more expensive up front, but doesn't have any subscription fees. $2/month for a blog and $15/month for a newspaper really adds up.
I see an e-reader as a device to read words, novels, books. Manga is black and white. Sure there is some grayscale, but it works just as well with only black and whitenon-black. When, where and how and lets compare definitions of 'book'.
And how does that make me desperate? Desperate for what? And I never said I was going to buy it.
When the first gen Zunes were announced to have wi-fi sharing I thought it would be the end of iPod dominance. I figured all indie acts would go out and buy one and let it run in share mode when they do a live show. Then I found out about the DRM-off-3 that wraps ALL shared content in DRM even if you want to give it away for free.
Compare:
Are you saying that these are not books?:
If you don't believe that these are books, then there is not point in debating with you. You were talking about a subset of books. I was talking about all books. No big deal.