I don't understand something. It's a recurring theme on Geeknights that Scrym has plenty of money, but very little time. We then hear about 5:02am train rides and long daily commutes. The 5:02 train is 78 minutes! And that just gets you to Grand Central.
If this is the case, then why don't you live closer to (or in) the city? Sure, rent will be more expensive. But so what? Do you value money more than your time?
My commute is exactly 4 minutes. If I'm unlucky it's 5. Obviously that's not going to happen to everyone, but I have 2-3 hours more per day to do what I want to do. I would never give that away - and I don't even do a daily podcast.
If space is the issue, just pony up the extra cash for an equally large place that's closer to the city. I've heard the excuse that you want to be centrally located to the FRC. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that spending many hours per week to save a couple of hours on the occasional weekend is not a great bargain.
So why the inconsistency?
Comments
Also, the time on the train is no different than my time at home. I have a computer, books, DVDs, fansubs, comics, manga, etc... None of that time is wasted, as I do with it things I would have been doing at home anyway. My only real "commute" is the time it takes to drive from our house to the train station, which is about six minutes from door to train.
The train ride may be long but if you are prepared it is time you can spend well. Unlike driving to work you can get a lot done on the train.
It's beautiful up there in the mountains. ^_^