With the news of Ted Kennedy having a malignant brain tumor do you think he should step down from the Senate?
The governor of MA is a Democrat so the seat would not be switching parties if the gov. appointed someone to fill the vacancy and it might be far out enough to allow someone else to run for the seat in November.
Comments
EDIT: Also, I say he should continue serving until he is physically incapable. Alternatively, he can serve as long as he damn well pleases. A malignant tumor doesn't necessarily mean you can't be a senator.
Ted Kennedy shouldn't be a senator because he is a murderer, not because he has a brain tumor. If any of us had done that, we would be in prison.
Classy with a "K".
Instead of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" it is read as "Do unto others as they do unto you." The misguided idea is that if someone else treats you like crap they must also want to be treated like crap.
Kennedy has done damn good work for the Democratic party. I have no doubt that some of the things he has done to advance the rights of woman have been done to assuage his guilty conscience over the events of that night on the bridge.
I may disagree with Ted Kennedy's politics (same as I do with Joe) but I would never wish personal hardship on another just because I disagree with them.
And I have very little compassion for a group that rallies around its murderers and rapists. The Kennedys can shed their crocodile tears, but it doesn't make them better than me.
And My golden rule is the standard "do unto others," but once someone becomes a rapist or murderer, my personal ethics would be satisfied with seeing them put down like a rabid dog so that they cannot do unto others again. Once someone turns down that road, they stop being an "other" in my eyes.
And before anyone else decides to try to use tenets of my Christian faith against me, the original Hebrew wording of the sixth commandment is much closer to condemning murder, not killing.
And I have a heart. It just doesn't beat for a murderer.