This shows the danger of holding ISPs accountable for content online. What incentive do ISPs have to preserve free speech online if they are being fined for content posted by other people? Verizon's final solution speaks to a more dangerous trend in censoring the internet through blanket banning rather than spending the greater cost to monitor and selectively remove content (even that rubs me the wrong way, but...yeah).
Fundamentally, I believe in media literacy rather than censorship.
Comments
Can't you get around this by not using Verizon's DNS and/or proxies?
Fundamentally, I believe in media literacy rather than censorship.
However, if this really is the "core issue", why the hell isn't Verizon saying so?
From what I've read, this seems to be more a matter of economic realities rather than technical realities.
EDIT: ...a matter of economic and political realities. It is the legal realities of lawsuits that make this an economic issue.