Using an NTFS partition for a linux user directory.
It all started late last night...
I use windows XP on my laptop and while I was downloading some Videos from Revision 3 over bittorrent, uTorrent told me it had experienced a cyclic redundancy check error and that there was now something wrong with its listening port. I check my network configuration and the only thing different since the last time I used bittorrent was that I had installed
VMware workstation and it had added a few networking adapters. So I went to uninstall it but while it was uninstalling my system went into a total freeze. No mouse movement, not nothing. So I did a hard shutdown and rebooted into safe mode. I logged in as administrator and did a system restore which took FOREVER despite me only installing VMWare earlier that evening.
When windows began booting, I got the BSOD with the error "UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME". My heart jumped. I rebooted: Same Error.
I ran over to my workbench (I do pc repair) and grabbed my copy of
Spinrite and popped it in. It's been running on level 2 (find and recover data) all night and still going! I'm seeing 750705 seek errors. Here is the rest of my SMART info
ECC Corrected: 94/94 Raw:0000000000000
Relocated sect: 60/64 Raw:00000000000B5
Seek errors: 54/54 RAW:000001115EB8BD
Uncorrectable: RAW:0000000000005
Dynastat Recovery: 1
Uncorrectable Sectors:173
Should I stop now and try to get as much of my data off as I can, then continue or wait for Spinrite to finish (question mark). I'm using an old p2 tower with a keyboard thats kinda broken. Sorry.
Comments
My predicament is that the Time Remaining counter keeps going up.
Example: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136178
That comes to 15c/GB, funnily enough.
If it was, say, 10GB you needed to backup, for a year of storage that's $20 for Jungledisk + $1.00 upload + $18 storage = $39; as compared to 160GB HDDs at the same price (though they are poor value; 320GB HDDs for ~$60 are a better deal.).
So, to say "way cheaper" is nothing short of misleading; It would only be cheaper if you were storing less than 10GB for less than a year or so (but even then the qualifier of "way" is wholly inappropriate"), and with that kind of amount, you wouldn't need to buy an entirely new hard drive just to back it up (finding such a small amount of space on another hard drive would be easy, or you could even just fit that kind of small amount on DVDs).
I'm not saying this makes the service useless (some of its advantages are great), merely that isn't as cheap as you claim.
Also, they charge not only based on what you keep, but based on what you upload. Here are the prices for S3. Let's say you start by uploading 10G. Ok, that means the bill for your first month will be $2.50. If you don't upload or download anything, the bill just for keeping those 10G safe is $1.50 per month. And, of course, there's also the $20 one-time fee for the JungleDisk application.
I am willing to agree that you can't exactly make a direct comparison, but the problem is that that is exactly what you did initially when you said "way cheaper".
M-flo - Planet Shining