How To Make A Debate Club
I am needing help with this. I would like to start a school club that examines the basics and different aspects of debate and eventually holds debates. I know the way to officially start a club at my school but I need to research the subject so that I have a concrete and specific understanding as opposed to my conceptual understanding. That is what brings me here, to ask the people of the FRC Forums for resources of knowledge concerning Debate.
Comments
1) Introduce concepts of critical thinking;
2) Research different debate styles and formats;
3) Choose an academic debate style or format commonly used in my area by other schools/debate groups;
4) Then I would pick a few basic topics to debate (simple, less morally/ethically complicated topics to begin to begin with that were of interest to those in the debate team); and,
5) Start holding and scheduling debates on a weekly basis (pick a topic, choose teams, have some preparation sessions, and then debate).
I would also look into local, State, and Nation debate organizations - find out there set-ups and see if I wanted to create a qualifying club with an eye toward debating against other schools OR decide to keep the debates within my own school and its club.
On the other hand, if you want a group that learns impromptu and extemp speaking skills and then holds internal debates for fun, you should probably enlist whatever teacher on your staff knows the most about speaking skills, then just start. Have meetings, teach the basics of public speaking, and when people are ready, formulate some basic rules of order and go to town.
I was a part of the National Forensics League, and they're the largest in the nation. Also, it gives students an opportunity to travel to colleges for some tournaments, and is one club many colleges look out for (something to consider when you're making a sales pitch).
NFL Online
Also, where are you from? I could probably give you some information on the area competition.
Basically, we'd read as many citations as we could within a time limit. We'd then read our canned argument. The opposing team would make points and rebut, and we would rebut back with more canned points.
For example, say we've decided to argue that US hegemony is a good thing. We take the "US HEGE GOOD" box out and read the opening statement and all of the canned main points. The enemy team tries to rebut us and makes a series of their own points.
Now, you don't actually listen to the points people are making. Basically, you just listen for keywords. If, in the course of one of their points, the enemy team cites Bill Clinton in any way, for example, we just pull out the "CLINTON BAD" folder and use the canned points within against that argument. (We, of course, also had CLINTON GOOD and CLINTON IRRELEVANT folders). If they said "independence" or "freedom," we'd pull out the "LIBERTARIANISM BAD" folder. You make specific classes of arguments and get points in a very deterministic fashion. You could totally get away with using CLINTON BAD and CLINTON GOOD in the same argument. Don't even get me started on "flowing."
There is not a single shred of debate in competitive high school debate.
I wanted to know if there was some universal/standard/official book to read about debate, I know there are quite a few wikis about it, but you all know how academia is about wiki.
In the episode about logical fallacies Rym and Scott(what is Scrym?) mention the debate between Sophocles and Calycles, the debating for truth and debating to win, how is 'calycles' spelled because I have had no luck in finding out how to spell it.
I live in the Bay Area(CA) Socha.