I did, but it was listed for "athletics" and "cancer." I thought scientists just said it had a slight effect on cellular health.
I TOLD you some herbs had done well in studies, specifically Saint John's Wort and Valerian, and you refused to believe me. Most of these things are just stuff I drink in tea because it is yum, like rosehips and lavender.
I really like this chart. It's pretty and informative.
I TOLD you some herbs had done well in studies, specifically Saint John's Wort and Valerian, and you refused to believe me. Most of these things are just stuff I drink in tea because it is yum, like rosehips and lavender.
Even if an herb has some medicinal effect, there is no reason to eat the herb itself. Any of those medicinal qualities are caused by a chemical, or combination of chemicals, that are present in the herb. Depending on how you ingest the herb, and how much, you really have no idea exactly how much of the active chemical you will actually be taking, or how effective it will be. If Valerian has something good in it that you should be taking regularly, then scientists will figure out what the chemical is, isolate it, and produce it in a form for maximum effectiveness with controlled and prescribed dosage. Also, you have no idea what other chemicals are in the herb, and what effects they may have.
If you have pneumonia, you don't eat mold, you take penicillin (if you aren't allergic). The only time you would eat the mold is if you had pneumonia after the apocalypse and you were able to recognize the mold. We live in a society where using herbs for medicinal purposes is unnecessary, so don't do it.
This is why I disagree with medical marijuana. Not because I don't think people should be allowed to smoke weed, but because the application of it is clearly not medically sound. If marijuana has a medicinal purpose, then it is the result of a few chemicals in the marijuana. If you want to use those chemicals as medicine, isolate them, produce them in an effective dosage form with calculated dosage amounts.
@ Scott: There are many tests on the effectiveness of various herbs and vitamins in various forms. Sometimes consuming the herb itself is more effective and sometimes pills and extracts are more effective, and sometimes both are equally effective. Amounts of various forms are also studied and those studies lead to recommended dosage in their various forms. Seriously Scott, you are talking out of your butt a bit on this issue and leaping to conclusions without seeing the facts.
That is a great article and the points are valid, but that doesn't apply to ALL medicines and ALL supplements. You are taking his statements and projecting them on all possible supplements and medicines. EDIT: My oncologist presented me with information from a study that showed that antioxidants from berries are much more effective when you eat the berries than when you eat the extract or pill form of the supplements and that the reason for this is still being researched.
That is a great article and the points are valid, but that doesn't apply to ALL medicines and ALL supplements.
"The point of this exercise was to demonstrate to students the distinctions between the safety and efficacy of crude plant products relative to pure drugs isolated from such natural sources."
The same points apply to all use of "crude plant products" as medicine as opposed to "pure drugs isolated from such natural sources".
Comments
I TOLD you some herbs had done well in studies, specifically Saint John's Wort and Valerian, and you refused to believe me.
Most of these things are just stuff I drink in tea because it is yum, like rosehips and lavender.
I really like this chart. It's pretty and informative.
If you have pneumonia, you don't eat mold, you take penicillin (if you aren't allergic). The only time you would eat the mold is if you had pneumonia after the apocalypse and you were able to recognize the mold. We live in a society where using herbs for medicinal purposes is unnecessary, so don't do it.
This is why I disagree with medical marijuana. Not because I don't think people should be allowed to smoke weed, but because the application of it is clearly not medically sound. If marijuana has a medicinal purpose, then it is the result of a few chemicals in the marijuana. If you want to use those chemicals as medicine, isolate them, produce them in an effective dosage form with calculated dosage amounts.
Why We Don't Prescribe Bark for Cancer
EDIT: My oncologist presented me with information from a study that showed that antioxidants from berries are much more effective when you eat the berries than when you eat the extract or pill form of the supplements and that the reason for this is still being researched.
The same points apply to all use of "crude plant products" as medicine as opposed to "pure drugs isolated from such natural sources".