I just looked up the Eyjafjallajökull volcano, and realized that Pola and I visited it in 2007:
In this truck:
Meanwhile I'm staying with friends in Istanbul until... well, I don't know. My next gig is on Wednesday, in the south of Spain, so I hope I can just fly straight there. There's a place near Malaga I've wanted to visit for ages, but last time I was there I had a really bad back and didn't feel like it.
Comments
As for people inconvenience by flight cancellations cry me a river.
Same dude invented the Box kite, and invented a rotary engine in 1889.
The problem here is not that flight is disrupted, that technology is imperfect, or that many people are minorly inconvenienced. The only problem is that people take these things for granted. It is a good thing when something like this happens, as it hopefully gives people a chance to stop, think, and realize just what is going on.
"*whine* I want to go halfway around the world in a matter of hours, and I can't!"
The only response to that is a slap to the face followed by a STFU.
The Mona Lisa is a miraculous achievement. So are the Pyramids. If I say "Man, monetary constraints prohibit me from visiting these wonders! I really wish I could see them and enjoy them as intended," who the fuck would slap me and tell me off for that?
That aside, we all know what's happening here, and it's hardly the first time it's happened. Scott is saying "No, I'm Right, It's My way or you're stupid", and we're saying "No, Scott, you're being a jackass, and here's why." and nobody is going to bend on their position, because in our view, Scott's arguments only apply in Bizzaro-Scott-world, as opposed to the general consensus of what most would call reality, and we can make the justified assumption based on previous behaviour that if he were in the situation of those he's saying are behaving stupidly by complaining, he'd be complaining louder, longer, and harder than anyone else, and Scott because, Well, When has Scott EVER conceded an argument without having to have been beaten over the head with three and three-quarter tonne of concrete, absolutely, 100% indisputable(No matter how ridiculous the dispute may be) evidence?
Essentially, it has devolved into a verbose version of what is essentially -
10 Print "Scott, You're being a jackass, and here's why we think so."
20 Print "Nuh-Uh, You're being stupid, and here's why I think so"
30 Print "Yuh-Uh, You're being a jackass, and here's why we think so."
40 Goto 20
So, can we just stop now? I mean, I'm looking forward to Scott putting forward 15 different versions of the Historian's Fallacy, with 20 different versions of "No, You're being a jackass, and here's why we think that" as much as anyone, but really, is it necessary? None of us are new enough to think this discussion is going to bear any worthwhile fruit, after all, so why must we fertilise the tree with another heaping of bullshit?
Jesus christ we're in trouble when I'm the one being the voice of calm and reason.
20 GOTO Churba