This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

Irony Punctuation

edited August 2010 in Forum Stuff
I know some of you like to use the green text to denote irony or sarcasm. Well, behold! There may be a better answer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation

Actually, fuck this stupid punctuation mark⸮
«1

Comments

  • edited August 2010
    Why on earth would you want to use such bizzare punctuation‽
    (Interrobang has to be the best name for a piece of punctuation ever.)
    Post edited by Omnutia on
  • I'm pretty good with just using /sarcasm.
  • Seems kinda hipster-ish. :P
  • Something must be wrong with my fonts. I don't see a backward question mark. I see a box with 2 E inside it twice.
  • My, what a useful addition to our grammar⸮
  • Note that the use of the irony mark would be hard for laptop users due to the lack of a number pad, through which is the only method to type in unicode numbers.
  • I just copypasted it from wikipedia, but someone pointed out to me that if you use GTK-based applications, you can just press Ctrl+Shift+u, enter the unicode number (2e2e in case of a ⸮) and then press the space bar. The normal number keys work here.
  • WOW! Someone read Wikipedia instead of doing work! Astonishing, amazing, are you fucking kidding me? Who cares, the 'irony' mark is just as stupid as colouring text green. The only unofficial punctuation mark that's fun is the interrobang.
  • Something must be wrong with my fonts. I don't see a backward question mark. I see a box with 2 E inside it twice.
    I see the same thing in firefox, and a blank box in google chrome and mobile safari.
  • Who cares, the 'irony' mark is just as stupid as colouring text green.
    It's useful for someone like me who has a very hard time recognizing whether someone is being sarcastic or not. It just doesn't process very well in the mind.
  • Are people really so dense that we need an irony mark?
  • Are People really are so dense that we need an irony mark. ?
  • This could work⸮
  • If you seriously need a mark to recognize sarcasm or irony in text, you're fucking braindead. Exceptions for languages that have such marks built in to their character systems. That's not a personal attack on anyone who has have missed sarcasm or irony in text (it happens), but read some fucking Elmore Leonard and tell me such a mark is remotely necessary.
  • Languages grow and change. Perhaps in this globalised world, adding such a grammatical construct would make it easier to understand the language. English is a shit of a language to learn as it is.
  • By that logic, Japan should adopt a phonetic alphabet for all purposes, as should all languages using character systems less common than Roman alphabet variants. Learning 10k+ kanji to read a newspaper is an infinitly more arduous mental task than shaping preformed linguistic structures to recognize a near-universal spoken and textual element of communication.

    By all means, improve my language. Add new character radicals for phonemes and sounds that don't exist. But don't play at assuming that the speaker or reader is dumb. Future generations should learn how to process meaning by context and/or tonal inflection. That's as much a part of language as anything else. There is no reason to alter it.

    10:1 if HungryJoe was here all yeasayers would have been ripped new assholes.
  • edited August 2010
    I grant you that when I am in Fukuoka I do have trouble reading newspapers with my limited Kanji, and occasionally find myself deriding the idea that conveying a message through media is helped by the deployment of an 10000 strong character base... The context of the article usually carries me through of course but I digress.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly in that I believe the average reader is of optimum intelligence and can interpret an ironic detachment from context. I merely put forward the notion that languages change, and to fight this is perhaps an exercise in futility. We do not find the exclamation mark, the question mark, the ellipsis and other forms of punctuation offensive as means of conveying context; why is the 'irony mark' any more repulsive?
    Post edited by Casa Vino on
  • Just so you know: If you take away kanji. Japanese stops working.
  • English is a shit of a language to learn as it is.
    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA-not.
  • @Omnu: Yeah, I know. I'm just making the point that attempting to reengineer languages in the interest of making them easier for the globalized world.

    @Casa Vino: You seem very well read, likely a polyglot as well. That's very cool. Anyway, I suppose my point is that while vocabularies evolve, grammatical strictures and the punctuation associated with them largely fossilize. Whereas we can create new words and find new ways to implement preexisting grammar, we shouldn't look to fix our language. Such changes, if they occur at all, should be organic rather than planned and engineered; it's the best way to avoid a cluttered language and simultaneously the best way to keep one intelligent. If we needed a sarcasm or irony mark, one would have appeared in natural usage a long time ago. Presumably, this hasn't happened since our minds are built to read and interpret context in tandem. The same thing happens with puns, mondegreens, and the more intricate tricks of language. We recognize them by context and quality in lieu of of special markings.

    Ultimately, I think the fact that someone patented their sarcasm mark speaks to its lack of necessity. If someone attempts to make money from grammar, it's a safe bet that that element is unnecessary.

    Also, I would side with Nine. English isn't particularly difficult as a language. It's subleties are more difficult to pick up, but the core of the language isn't any more complex than German or perhaps Dutch.
  • Also, I would side with Nine. English isn't particularly difficult as a language. It's subleties are more difficult to pick up, but the core of the language isn't any more complex than German or perhaps Dutch.
    The latin languages have similar structures for grammar. From what I heard, english just has more exceptions than most languages (which as a french speaker I doubt) and spelling/pronunciation can be tricky.


  • Actually, fuck this stupid punctuation mark⸮
    We use that mark to start a question in Spanish :O
  • We use that mark to start a question in Spanish :O
    I thought you use an upside down question mark, not a backwards one.
  • We use that mark to start a question in Spanish :O
    I thought you use an upside down question mark, not a backwards one.
    That is correct. It definitely is upside down.
  • We use that mark to start a question in Spanish :O
    I thought you use an upside down question mark, not a backwards one.
    That is correct. It definitely is upside down.
    You guys are right!
    It has being a long time since I wrote anything in Spanish. :(
  • It has being a long time since I wrote anything in Spanish. :(
    Feel free to make threads and posts in any language you want. Everything is Unicode, so it should all "just work". And by should, I mean probably won't as soon as someone tries to do something funky.

    I am by no means fluent in Spanish, but I can understand about 25% of the Spanish advertisements I see in the subway due to Spanish classes in middle school and high school.
  • ¡Gracias Scott!
    Finalmente podre practicar mi español :D
  • I never learnt any Spanish, but it's pretty obvious what that means anyway.
  • I never learnt any Spanish, but it's pretty obvious what that means anyway.
    Mira este cabron, ¿eh? ¡Tiene muy buena opinión de él mismo!
Sign In or Register to comment.