›
This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

Props of the Day

WyattWyatt
edited September 2010 in Everything Else
We have a Think of the Day, Fail of the Day, and a Boo-Yah! thread. I think it's about time we had a thread to give some "proper respect" or props to the people who made our day a little better or life a little easier.

For our first FRC forum props, I would now like to thank whom ever in the film industry that started the trend of make parents not suck in teen movies. Dirty Dancing, 16 Candles, The Breakfast Cub... every parent in those movies was either ignorant, neglectful, verbally/physically abusive, or just plain sucked at life. Juno, Easy A and other modern films have smart, caring, interesting, funny and realistically written adult figures. As a consumer, I appreciate this change and would like it to continue.

Comments

  • ......
    image
  • GeoGeo
    image
    to...?
  • Victor FrostVictor Frost
    image
    to...?
    Who cares? Those props are mad.
  • beebzzbeebzz
    Ok so i got a new pair of Sony headphones a couple of days ago. wile i should have been amazed at the 120 dollar product I had just bought;I found that I was instead mesmerized by the design and craftsmanship of the box it had come in. so i would like to give a props to any company that puts good thought and care into the packaging they put their products in.
  • RymRym
    Why didn't you just call this the "PAX Enforcers Thread" instead. ;^)
  • DromaroDromaro
    Seriously? I don't feel like I did anything epic as an enforcer. I was just.....me. I'm not used to all this "Enforcers are awesome." business.
  • Victor FrostVictor Frost
    edited September 2010
    image
    Post edited by Victor Frost on
  • RymRym
    Seriously? I don't feel like I did anything epic as an enforcer.
    Ever been to Otakon?

    The lowliest Enforcer, the weakest link therein, is epic win by comparison.
  • DromaroDromaro
    I have not been to Otakon. My expectation when dealing with other people in general is that they will fail until prove they will not.
  • VigaViga
    Your mom gets props today!
  • ......
    Sonic, at least get the one that doesn't have the typo and crap typeface.
  • SailSail
    [img]
    My awesome what?
  • La Petit MortLa Petit Mort
    [img]
    My awesome what?
    Maybe it's an object called awesome.
  • WalkerWalker
    [img]
    My awesome what?
    Maybe it's an object called awesome.
    It's a contraction. :/
  • WindUpBirdWindUpBird
    edited September 2010
    1. It's a contraction. :/

    Nope. "You're" is a contraction. "Your" indicates possession.

    Learn this noise, internets!
    Post edited by WindUpBird on
  • WalkerWalker
    edited September 2010
    1. It's a contraction. :/

    Nope. "You're" is a contraction. "Your" indicates possession.

    Learn this noise, internets!
    "Whose" is possessive, "who's" is a contraction. Learn yo' shit, forumites.
    Post edited by Walker on
  • WindUpBirdWindUpBird
    edited September 2010
    1. It's a contraction. :/

    Nope. "You're" is a contraction. "Your" indicates possession.

    Learn this noise, internets!
    "Whose" is possessive, "who's" is a contraction. Learn yo' shit, forumites.
    I know that shit, fool! The issue of the usage of "Who's" versus "whose" in the above macro is not what is being questioned here, mothafucka!

    My props: To the fine individuals of Chopstix Chinese Restaurant in Champaign, IL. There comes a time in every young man's life where he says, "I need a gallon of wonton soup, some General Tso's Chicken, and a pound of beef fried rice at 3am, and I don't want to get off my ass to get it." Up until today, the needs of such young men in Champaign were left horribly, horribly unfulfilled. Thank you, Chopstix, for bringing MSG goodness to my door at all ungodly hours, starting today.
    Post edited by WindUpBird on
  • Victor FrostVictor Frost
    You all know what the picture means. Stop being difficult.
  • ......
    No, you stop being lazy. You grabbed the worst possible version that exists out there on the internet! I'm still flabbergasted that you even managed to find that one instead of the better, correct, ones.
  • WindUpBirdWindUpBird
    No, you stop being lazy. You grabbed the worst possible version that exists out there on the internet! I'm still flabbergasted that you even managed to find that one instead of the better, correct, ones.
    I hate to admit that the version I laughed the hardest at is the version that could NEVER be posted on these boards. Ever.
  • Victor FrostVictor Frost
    This one?
  • WalkerWalker
    edited September 2010
    I know that shit, fool! The issue of the usage of "Who's" versus "whose" in the above macro is not what is being questioned here, mothafucka!
    DERP.
    image
    My bad.
    Post edited by Walker on
  • progSHELLprogSHELL
    No, you stop being lazy. You grabbed the worst possible version that exists out there on the internet! I'm still flabbergasted that you even managed to find that one instead of the better, correct, ones.
    I hate to admit that the version I laughed the hardest at is the version that could NEVER be posted on these boards. Ever.
    Is there a rule against awesome titties?
  • WindUpBirdWindUpBird
    No, you stop being lazy. You grabbed the worst possible version that exists out there on the internet! I'm still flabbergasted that you even managed to find that one instead of the better, correct, ones.
    I hate to admit that the version I laughed the hardest at is the version that could NEVER be posted on these boards. Ever.
    Is there a rule against awesome titties?
    Probably not, but the one I'm thinking of is even more explicit.
  • ......
    My bad.
    >my face when the same fucking mistake is in that image.
    image
  • progSHELLprogSHELL
    No, you stop being lazy. You grabbed the worst possible version that exists out there on the internet! I'm still flabbergasted that you even managed to find that one instead of the better, correct, ones.
    I hate to admit that the version I laughed the hardest at is the version that could NEVER be posted on these boards. Ever.
    Is there a rule against awesome titties?
    Probably not, but the one I'm thinking of is even more explicit.
    Oh, You mean This one. This photo is not safe for: work, home, small children, anyone under the age of 18, anyone who has a problem with porn, human beings with an intact soul.
  • WindUpBirdWindUpBird
    Oh, You meanThis one.This photo is not safe for: work, home, small children, anyone under the age of 18, anyone who has a problem with porn, human beings with an intact soul.
    That's the one. I'd like to think my soul is intact even though I lol'd when I saw that the first time.

    I do have to wonder why you sought that out, though...
  • progSHELLprogSHELL
    I do have to wonder why you sought that out, though...
    If something is unknown, I MUST KNOW IT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.