I still play Magic on occasion. It's a fun game, but I no longer spend any big money on cards. I mostly play it online through various programs, and that's pretty much about it. However, I do get somewhat excited and follow along whenever a new set is released. Today Wizards of the Coast had an art gallery on their magic homepage presenting
some of the new art in the upcoming set Magic 2012. Among them this piece:
This is a leonin, a member of a sentient race of lions which are home to a world called Mirrodin, but also pop up in other places such as a world called Alara. The most famous Leonin in Magic is a planeswalker called Ajani Goldmane (a planeswalker being a very powerful wizard able to transfer from one world to another). This is him:
In the
thread about this article on MTGSalvation, probably the biggest online magic community out there, I came across this post:
Shale WarBringerWhy is there an Ajani art, since we know that he is replaced by Gigeon?
Perhaps I should explain the context: The card
Ajani Goldmane was one of the first planeswalker cards, a new cardtype in Magic that was introduced only a couple of years ago. Though Ajani got a second card (
Ajani Vengeant), Goldmane was reprinted in both Magic 2010 and Magic 2011, them being the "Core Sets" being released every year as the most rudimentary sets giving a basis for all formats and teaching the rules to new players. However, in Magic 2012 he will be replaced by a different white planeswalker named Gideon Jura (white of course being one of the colors of Magic, distinct from blue, black, red and green; not the color of skin).
Nevertheless, the comment left a bad taste in my mouth, since it struck me as very racist similar to "all black people look alike to me", this being of course "all leonin look alike to me". However, I'm not sure if I even should feel that way, considering this is all make belief. Is it actually racist of it is about things that don't actually exist? Would a statement like "all smurfs look alike to me" also be racist?
Comments
From what I can tell in your post, there's nothing racist about this Magic card business.
Racism requires a victims that is, at some point, an actual person or group of people. If you have a fantasy world with a race of rats who all display distinctly negative Jewish stereotypes and the story is about cleanings the "home" of these "rats" by gassing them then it would be racist.
In fiction you can also use the "all smurfs look blue to me" trope to talk about racism without actually being racist (see x-men) by demonstrating the negative impact without singling out any one real victim.
Also, before anyone says "HER DERP YOU THINK MAUS IS RACIST LOL?", no Maus isn't racist.
However, yeah, of course you "can" be racist in a fantasy setting. You can be racist in any setting. Is it okay to be racist in a fantasy setting? Maybe. It depends on the point of the work.
Edit: It also occurs to me that whether you mean "can" as in, "is it possible"; or "can" as in "is it permissible" also changes the details of the answers slightly.
Anyway, there can be racism within a fantasy setting -- LotR is all about a race war -- but I'm not sure that a person in the real world can be racist about a fantasy setting. If someone says that "Orcs are inferior and should be executed to make way for a master race of Elves" that doesn't mean they are a racist. That being said, fantasy settings can indicate an amount of reflection of genuine racism in the real world. It's another example that fantasy is a good analog for people to gain understanding about the real world.
That Shale WarBringer guy clearly landed on his head after he fell of a cliff.