Not exactly cybernetics, but there's already cybernetic retinas and various other cybernetic research developments in progress.
It doesn't take a lot of imagination to see the possibilities.
What cybernetic enhancements would you have, if any?
What are the implications of cybernetic enhancements of cybernetics? (without referencing the matrix/ ghost in the shell/ terminator or any other fiction)
Comments
The series is a little on the soft side of sci-fi, but it does touch on some of the possibilities for that kind of enhancement, and spends a little time looking at some of the social implications.
@Dazzle369 :Sorry. I didn't mean to come off as dismissive, Like my father is fond of saying "Any conversation worth having is worth having twice."
Lack of imagination is a problem with modern culture. That's another topic.
For the people here who do have some imagination, albeit anyone who hasn't already done so in the google glass thread. I'd like to see what unique ideas people have for cybernetics and what it could do for humanity. Good or bad.
Like a pair of virtual earphones that you can tune to a device of your choosing.
Sure, a first step *could* be some kind of advanced inner ear replacement, but I would prefer to just skip the wetware and go straight to the source.
So you'll think a task to an external cpu, and that then will send you back the computed data when it's done.
So that information doesn't necessarily have to be maths. It could be just knowledge in general.
Instead of Googling, you'd just think a question, and have the answer already.
Or at least have a response enough to refine your question.
The challenge is to have a cybernetic interface sophisticated enough to communicate with all your neurons.
Then computer language that can translate your thought into understandable information.
Might make teaching obsolete. A good thing?
But things like volume control would still have to be externalised. What if by malfunction, your implant goes into overdrive and gives you brain damage?
There is a big difference between "Being imaginative enough to figure out the potential of Google Glass" and "mentally masturbating to what amounts to science fiction", but it's one that tends to be ignored or flown straight over in any glass discussion without a second thought.
Of course, you could say "Oh, but the potential of AR and the potential of google glass are the same thing at this time", but while that's true(being the best "available" AR solution right now), that doesn't mean that Google glass is capable of performing any AR thing that one can invent, as people often do.
I assume you would have volume limiters etc, and I do not know the "elegant" solution to volume control, if nothing else, I guess you just adjust it on the source device.
Either that, or under the skin implants. Tiny little pressure sensors. Seems a bit silly if you think about it, but then again, if it works...
The disadvantage, is when some happens that you don't want to happen, that's where you have to intervene.
What you don't want is to have to constantly think to yourself 'no adrenaline no adrenaline no adrenaline no adrenaline ...'
You want either some form of replacement system for adrenal control, that's more advanced than your biological systems, or some kind of secondary mechanism that initialises under certain conditions.
I don't think we'll get there for a while, though. Even our most promising neural connections aren't nanoscale yet (I'm thinking of the piezoelectric sensing aparatus used by that robotic arm which has a sense of touch).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9926945/Bionic-eye-could-make-radical-difference-to-lives.html
I talked to him about it a few years ago and he was super excited about it. It seems like it is paying off!
http://www.k2.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/fusion/Janken/janken.wmv
http://www.k2.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/fusion/Hand-eyeTracking/tracking.wmv
http://www.k2.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/fusion/InverseCatching/catch.wmv
I myself would probably have a cybernetic left leg, due to previous meniscus damage.
The next stage up is targeted muscle reinnervation in which reads impulses directly from nerve cells. Which allows for a higher resolution of fine control. Especially good for dexterity. The problem with TMR is lack of feedback. The reason we are able to do tasks efficiently with our hands is that we can teach ourselves by looking, then repeat on feel alone.
This is where artificial skin comes in.
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/533106/artificial-skin-that-senses-and-stretches-like-the-real-thing/
Beyond that there's power issues, and weight, processing power.