Better Design or interface? Or maybe Google felt like declaring themselves against the media establishment by obtaining one of the primary methods of violation?
Let's also remember there there are a whole lot of copyright issues that are unresolved. Time Warner came on board, but Universal is having nothing to do with it.
Of course, but how can you manage to make the site profitable? Ads aren't quite doing it for them now.
Thats what they need to figure out. Well they really haven't used ads at all. If you look at their site there really isn't anything at all. All they really make money on now are deals with NBC and some other companies to promote the material they post. Considering Google is basically an advertising company, and also that so many people go to youtube, it's definitly perfect for ads.
People thought Google was going to sink because they refused to splatter ads all over that glorious search page of theirs. It's always been (unless you customize it) just a blank white page with the Google logo and the search field. I think they already have a business plan to make YouTube just as profitable. You don't sink a billion bucks into something if you don't have the means to make it work.
Hahahaha. True. Did anyone try AOL's TV shows on demand service before it went belly-up a couple of months ago? There were several old shows (Eight Is Enough, Growing Pains, Lois & Clark, Batman, etc.) that could be watched via streaming video with a YouTube-like format, but there were commercials spliced directly into every "chapter" (two to three minutes apart). They could not be skipped. I think YouTube/Google's flash technology might make that a more viable option to solve the cashflow problem.
Comments
Or maybe Google felt like declaring themselves against the media establishment by obtaining one of the primary methods of violation?
Try it here.