It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Tonight on GeekNights, we review Gravity Falls in full. It's a pretty solid cartoon. In the news, we will be doing five shows at Anime Boston this weekend. Escaflowne is getting a dub via pre-orders on Kickstarter. Sakamoto desu ga looks up our alley. Also we talk a bunch about bike rooms, bike laws, and bike thieves.
Help us make awesome things on Patreon! And buy our T-shirt! (or don't)
Download MP3
Comments
Ok, crazy person go eat some poop. More chocolate for me.
I will remind Rym, however (not you Scott I know how you feel already), that you have a financial and egotistical reason to at least entertain my insane ranting considering I'm a supporter on Patreon.
The person who is outright refusing to watch one of the greatest and most significant animated works in all of history has no room to tell me that the reason I'm not watching their favorite show for irrational reasons, such as it being too new.
So...
Yeah.
Thanks to geeknights I just started Utena for the first time and, while I'd love to hear them talk about ATLA, I'm also pretty damn happy getting to watch an amazing show for the first time AND watch the geeknights presents after each one.
To Scott, I say, keep doing what you're doing until such a time comes as I've seen every gourmet chocolate you have, at which point, I'm free to bitch about you not having reviewed ATLA.
Really, it's a common thing among intelligent people. They have an idea, and they can argue really well in defense of that idea, so it can be a struggle to convince them of things that seem to you entirely reasonable - because their arguments are really, really good, and if they have a really good and entirely reasonable argument against it, the thing defeated by that argument can't be reasonable, can it?
CGPGrey is very prone to that sort of thing, to give an example without risk of sounding like I'm shitting on Scott or doing him unfairly - he gets himself into a position on something, and can argue really well for it, to a frustrating degree, even when he's completely and utterly wrong. For example, his arguments demanding the equivalent of General relativity or newton's laws, but for history, brilliant argumentation, but the concept is utterly flawed.
1: Incredibly well researched
2: Concise
As a result they come out very infrequently but when they do, you can learn in a few minutes about something pretty interesting. Like what's going on with all those EU kinda countries, or how the rules of succession for the papacy work.