I've heard it mentioned on Geek Nights before, but how do you highlight a piece of a file that is background noise to cancel it out of the whole thing even if you are talking. Is this possible? I'm trying to get this file as professional sounding as I can for a website that I'm making. Any tips would be greatly appreciated.
Comments
But you could try the "Noise Reduction" feature under the "Effect" tab.
- Use one unidirectional microphone per speaker.
- Use a downward expander (one per input if possible, but one near the end of the chain is far better than none).
- Use balanced cables.
- Ensure that all of your equipment is grounded to a common source.
- Use shockmounts or otherwise isolate microphones from mechanical vibrations.
Noise reduction in post-production depends quite a bit on the type of noise. For hums, you can generally use a high-pass filter to knock it out. Static can be removed with a low-pass filter. Background noise can be removed with a software noise gate or downward expander.Any other type of noise cannot easily be removed. Audacity's noise reduction does little more than analyze the frequency content of a sample and proportionally reduce the amplitudes of said frequencies. To get the sample, highlight a quiet section of your audio (containing ONLY the noise and nothing else). Then select "Noise Reduction" and then "Get Noise Profile." Now, select the entire audio track and remove the noise. It will use the last "noise profile" you took.
It's fairly inelegant, and rarely will it serve your purposes. You're better off removing the source of the noise or finding a less destructive method.
Audacity is still superior for process edit (even though it doesn't really work).
It does what it does and it's free. Good enough for me!
I used The GIMP just fine until I needed to print things. Then I needed Photoshop.
1. Download Audacity
2. Feel nice and warm because you've download open source software.
3. Pirate Adobe Audition 3.
4. Feel nice and warm because you're actually getting shit done.
What a bummer if I've been had.
Fuck Adobe.
Though I guess the source doesn't matter, does it? Passive data collection is passive data collection, no matter who does it.
If they offer real-time protection, then they significantly hurt performance by constantly checking everything for badness. If they don't offer real-time protection, then they don't find problems until it is too late. Even when they do detect something, there is no guarantee they will remove it 100%. The only way is to completely reinstall the operating system. Also, the vast majority of things you will encounter in the real world are going to be newer than the definitions known to the anti-virus, so it won't even detect them.
The only way to be absolutely safe is to never trust anything ever. ANYTHING EVER. REALLY. SERIOUSLY.
http://www.virtualbox.org/
If you want to do it a little easier, try making an Ubuntu VirtualBox first.