The film you are most likely asking about is James Cameron's Avatar (I'm assuming this due to the fact that you specifically said 3D film). Now if you are asking about the live action Avatar: the Last Airbender film, the teaser trailer is available online if you search for it on Youtube or on any film trailer web site.
Anything could be good, But as they say, the proof is in the pudding. I wouldn't put forward judgment until I've experienced it - Sort of like London, I didn't hold an opinion till I'd been there, despite what everyone was telling me about it, good and bad.
It could also end up like Dragonball: Evolution, which is what I think it will end up being.
I have more faith in James Cameron than that. I doubt it'll be great, especially for a Battle Angel fan of some dozen years or so like me. But I doubt it'll be awful. I'm looking forward to it (if it ever does get made).
What would be the best film too make into a 3D film?
It depends on how they utilize the 3D technology. If it's something like "Blowfish: The Movie," where the 3D is used to poke stuff at you, then it's not so great. If it's a movie like Coraline, where the 3D was used to provide depth to the backgrounds and enhance the style, then it's OK.
Hay iam from London what did you think of it? Bit boring isent it.
*Shrugs* Good Bits and bad bits like everywhere else. I'm from Australia, but I'm Leeds based now. I'm rather more fond of the north, it feels more like home. With Dodgey weather. I was down a few weeks ago, did some comedy about, Got hassled by chavs(And hassled them right back), swam in the Thames(Big, Big mistake that was) among other things.
I have more faith in James Cameron thanthat. I doubt it'll be great, especially for a Battle Angel fan of some dozen years or so like me. But I doubt it'll be awful. I'm looking forward to it (if it ever does get made).
I'll agree. I'd probably go and see the movie, if it ever comes out.
If it's a movie like Coraline, where the 3D was used to provide depth to the backgrounds and enhance the style, then it's OK.
I don't know if they're doing the same in the US, but they're releasing the latest final destination movie as a 3D movie over here, should be good for a laugh, if nothing else.
"Incomprehensible" means "difficult or impossible to understand." Transformers in 3D would be a giant mess of shiny robots and explosions. That wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, but you'd get lost easily. Transformers 2 in 3D would be tolerable so long as you replaced all the robots, explosions, dialogue, and "acting" with gratuitous shots of Megan Fox's ass.
Transformers 2 in 3D would be tolerable so long as you replaced all the robots, explosions, dialogue, and "acting" with gratuitous shots of Megan Fox's ass with fight scenes like Optimus vs. The Decepticons in the forest.
Alright, I can grant you that one. That was a pretty awesome fight scene; I also enjoyed the homage to Devastator. But really, it either needed to have way more of Megan Fox's ass, or she needed to not be there at all.
Also, would it kill them to make the transformers recognizable? I mean, it's pretty easy to spot Optimus Prime, but I have a hard time identifying the rest of them.
Comments
"Incomprehensible" means "difficult or impossible to understand." Transformers in 3D would be a giant mess of shiny robots and explosions. That wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, but you'd get lost easily. Transformers 2 in 3D would be tolerable so long as you replaced all the robots, explosions, dialogue, and "acting" with gratuitous shots of Megan Fox's ass.
Also, would it kill them to make the transformers recognizable? I mean, it's pretty easy to spot Optimus Prime, but I have a hard time identifying the rest of them.