This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

CDC Raw Milk Information Website

12346

Comments

  • I've been posting in this thread all this time and completely forgot about the time(s) I've consumed milk straight from the cow (well, from cow-to-bucket-to-table).

    It's good as hell.
  • Ultrapasteurized milk is awesome stuff. Drink away.
  • Does goats milk suffer the same effects? We used to keep a couple of them for milk, as my brother is lactose-intolerant and loves his milk. Aside from goat related injuries, there were no adverse effects. Was this luck or is goats milk less evil unpasteurized?

    (I have no science knowledge for the record, there is a reason I did applied sciences)
  • Was this luck or is goats milk less evil unpasteurized?
    It's hard to say, because raw goat milk consumption is ridiculously low. Insufficient data points to draw a solid conclusion.

    However, I have isolated pathogens from raw goat milk as well as raw cow milk. A substantial part of the risk of raw milk is that environmental cross-contamination is almost unavoidable on a farm. It's at least partly a process issue. Pasteurization is really a process control thing.

    I'm not sure about caprine tuberculosis, but I'm sure it's out there. We probably just haven't bothered looking, because goat farming is such a small market.

    Yes, public health is often a numbers game. I don't like it more than anyone else, but it's reality. We give greater priority to the things that affect more people.
  • The mention of goats milk has made me crave feta cheese.
  • The mention of goats milk has made me crave feta cheese.
    image
    This stuff is delicious.
  • Ultrapasteurized milk is awesome stuff. Drink away.
    Is it any better than standard pasteurization other than being shelf stable at room temp? Or are both pretty much equally good, provided you handle the end products properly?
  • Is it any better than standard pasteurization other than being shelf stable at room temp? Or are both pretty much equally good, provided you handle the end products properly?
    Well, ultrapasteurization is essentially sterilization. So it's technically superior to conventional pasteurization. However, conventional pasteurization is sufficient to render milk pretty safe. The main benefit of ultrapasteurization is extended shelf life and shelf stability.
  • The main benefit of ultrapasteurization is extended shelf life and shelf stability.IT TASTES AWESOME!
  • The main benefit of ultrapasteurization is extended shelf life and shelf stability.
    That is more important than even taste for me, as I rarely use milk for anything but cooking and possibly milk tea.
  • That is more important than even taste for me, as I rarely use milk for anything but cooking and possibly milk tea.
    Well, if that's all you need, then buy nonfat dry milk. It's what I do. Need fattier milk? Melt some butter and mix it in.
  • I've considered buying milk powder before.
  • Well, if that's all you need, then buy nonfat dry milk. It's what I do. Need fattier milk? Melt some butter and mix it in.
    Thank you so much for the advice.
  • If I didn't have to go out and buy more, I'd likely consume 4+ gallons of milk per week.
  • The main benefit of ultrapasteurization isextended shelf life and shelf stability.IT TASTES AWESOME!
    FUCKING THIS. UHT is the best tasting milk EVER. Maillard browning, I love ya.
  • Oh, I can appreciate Maillard browning... it's just that... it's not the milk I'm used to tasting. Not that I mind UHT milk, I just prefer my milk to taste like "milk," if you catch my drift.
  • Not that I mind UHT milk, I just prefer my milk to taste like "milk," if you catch my drift.
    Yup! And I agree. UHT is fine... if real milk isn't available. Thankfully I live close by to many shops, so I buy fresh milk every other day and stay in stock. I break out my UHT backup when too many people turn up unexpectedly and want hot chocolate.
  • edited February 2011
    I didn't like most of the milk I tried in the U.S.
    Perhaps the main issue was the lack of full cream milk in typical supermarkets. It was similarly so for yoghurt with a decent fat content.
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • I didn't like most of the milk I tried in the U.S.
    Perhaps the main issue was the lack of full cream milk in typical supermarkets. It was similarly so for yoghurt with a decent fat content.
  • I didn't like most of the milk I tried in the U.S.
    Perhaps the main issue was the lack of full cream milk in typical supermarkets. It was similarly so for yoghurt with a decent fat content.
    Every supermarket I have ever been to sells skim (0%), 1%, 2%, whole (3%), half-and-half(50%), buttermilk, and heavy cream (100%).
  • edited February 2011
    I doubt that heavy cream is 100% fat, by the way. Even butter is only 80%.
    Okay, so I probably tended to have whole milk while in the U.S., but what I had was still piss-poor compared to what I typically have here in Australia (Pauls full cream milk).
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • Every supermarket I have ever been to sells skim (0%), 1%, 2%, whole (3%), half-and-half(50%), buttermilk, and heavy cream (100%).
    Actually, heavy cream is only 35-40% milkfat; half-and-half is at most 18% (the name is derived from half cream, half milk).

    The wikipedia on cream suggests that we Americans are missing out on the good stuff (cream with greater than 40% milkfat).
  • edited February 2011
    I doubt that heavy cream is 100% fat, by the way. Even butter is only 80%.
    Okay, so I probably tended to have whole milk while in the U.S., but what I had was still piss-poor compared to what I typically have here in Australia (Pauls full cream milk).
    According to the Internet, Paul's Full Cream is 3.4% milk, which is a little bit more than you'll find in whole milk in US grocery stores.
    Post edited by Apreche on
  • edited February 2011
    Every supermarket I have ever been to sells skim (0%), 1%, 2%, whole (3%), half-and-half(50%), buttermilk, and heavy cream (100%).
    OK, I'm now going to explain butterfat percentages to you.

    The percentage in reference to milk is the percentage of butterfat in that milk. 1% milk is 1% butterfat. That means it has 1 g of fat in 100 mL of milk.

    Whole milk must be a minimum of 3.25% butterfat.

    Half-and-half is anywhere from 11% to 18% butterfat.

    Light cream can range from 18% to 30% butterfat.

    Heavy cream must be at least 36% butterfat.

    Butter must be at least 80% butterfat.
    Post edited by TheWhaleShark on
  • Whole milk must be a minimum of 3.25% butterfat.
    Then paul's full cream is just whole milk.
  • Then paul's full cream is just whole milk.
    Yes. "Full cream" is an advertising gimmick AFAIK.
  • We just have different naming in Australia; we generally use "full cream" instead of "whole".
    However, the point is that it tastes a lot better than the milk I had in the U.S.
  • We just have different naming in Australia; we generally use "full cream" instead of "whole".
    However, the point is that it tastes a lot better than the milk I had in the U.S.
    Australian cows.
  • We just have different naming in Australia; we generally use "full cream" instead of "whole".
    I've seen the term used in the US as well.
    Australian cows.
    This is entirely possible. There are also countless other variables that go into this.

    Try some Jersey (the cow, not the state) milk some time. Their milk is ~6% butterfat.
  • edited February 2011
    Australian cows.
    They're like regular cows, except psychotic and with poison horns.
    Post edited by Churba on
Sign In or Register to comment.