›
This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

The Gun Control Thread

1…34689…53

Comments

  • ChurbaChurba
    So what's the point they're trying to make again?
    Knives are scary, and so are guns. If you attach one to the other, it's like, double terror, man. You can kill people just by making them look at it.

  • AndrewAndrew
    Oh yeah, and you can attach a grenade launcher to the bayonet mount :psyduck:
  • GregGreg
    I mean... a grenade launcher CAN be attached there, if you have enough duct tape and can handle the recoil.

    Also, do bayonets really scare people? If I see a bayonet, I'll assume he's a very confused Civil War reenactor instead of anyone who intends to use their gun.
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    edited January 2013
    But does it have a chainsaw mount? Screw the bayonet video games have upperd the anti by attaching chainsaws onto guns!!!!!!!
    Post edited by HMTKSteve on
  • BronzdragonBronzdragon
    edited January 2013
    But does it have a chainsaw mount? Screw the bayonet; video games have upperd the ante by attaching chainsaws onto guns!!!!!!
    Post edited by Bronzdragon on
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    My new phone has a weird spell check on it. Sometimes I miss the typos.
  • lackofcheeselackofcheese
    edited January 2013
    But does it have a chainsaw mount? Screw the bayonet; video games have upperd the ante by attaching chainsaws onto guns!!!!!!
    upperd?
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    edited January 2013
    But does it have a chainsaw mount? Screw the bayonet; video games have upperd the ante by attaching chainsaws onto guns!!!!!!
    upperd?
    My phone changed upped to upper and when I went back to correct I added the d but must have missed removing the r. It's what I get for posting from my bed with only one eye open.

    Post edited by HMTKSteve on
  • lackofcheeselackofcheese
    edited January 2013
    Also, since "anti" is an actual word, even a spell check won't save you from something like that we step up the game on artificial intelligence, or at least get contextual probabilistic spell-checking.
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    But still... Chainsaws. A proper assault weapon should have a chainsaw mount.
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    edited January 2013
    Also, since "anti" is an actual word, even a spell check won't save you from something like that until we step up the game on artificial intelligence, or at least get contextual probabilistic spell-checking.
    Yup, none of us are immune...
    Post edited by HMTKSteve on
  • lackofcheeselackofcheese
    edited January 2013
    But still... Chainsaws. A proper assault weapon should have a chainsaw mount.
    Nah, just have a chainsword in one hand, and a bolt pistol in the other, like Assault Marines do. Or are you suggesting Assault Marines don't know how to assault?
    Also, since "anti" is an actual word, even a spell check won't save you from something like that until we step up the game on artificial intelligence, or at least get contextual probabilistic spell-checking.
    Yup, none of us are immune...
    Eeyup. Bring on the Singularity, I say! The sooner, the better.
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    Bold pistol?
  • lackofcheeselackofcheese
    Damn it, you got me just before I fixed that...
  • Dragonmaster LouDragonmaster Lou
    Also, do bayonets really scare people? If I see a bayonet, I'll assume he's a very confused Civil War reenactor instead of anyone who intends to use their gun.
    Actually, bayonet charges still do scare people. The British used it at least once in WW2 to scare the crap out of the Japanese in the Pacific theater, and I believe there also have been documented cases of bayonet charges scaring the crap out of the Taliban in Afghanistan.
    But still... Chainsaws. A proper assault weapon should have a chainsaw mount.
    That falls under "cool, but impractical."
  • CremlianCremlian
    edited January 2013
    image

    Pretty much spot on.
    Post edited by Cremlian on
  • RymRym
    edited January 2013
    image
    http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/lone-star-college-shooting-texas-college-shooting-lockdown-in-north-harris-county-school-reported?SDG
    Post edited by Rym on
  • ChurbaChurba
    Huh. I wonder why the frequency of these type of events has taken such a dramatic spike recently.
  • George PatchesGeorge Patches
    edited January 2013
    http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/lone-star-college-shooting-texas-college-shooting-lockdown-in-north-harris-county-school-reported?SDG
    Take that down, they updated it and it looks like two people shooting at each other. Probably related to drug dealing.
    Post edited by George Patches on
  • RymRym
    Initial reports hit it much higher, due to speculation about injured bystanders.
  • johndisjohndis
    That was not a mass shooting, it was just two people with guns shooting wildly at each other in a crowded area, which should be protected under the 2nd Amendment IMO.
  • HMTKSteveHMTKSteve
    edited January 2013
    Huh. I wonder why the frequency of these type of events has taken such a dramatic spike recently.
    Cuz Obuma gonna com and take all da gunz! Got to use em all before they get takenz away!

    (Spell check had a field day with that one!)
    Post edited by HMTKSteve on
  • ChurbaChurba
    That was not a mass shooting, it was just two people with guns shooting wildly at each other in a crowded area, which should be protected under the 2nd Amendment IMO.
    I didn't know you were from Texas.

  • George PatchesGeorge Patches
    Initial reports hit it much higher, due to speculation about injured bystanders.
    This really is an entirely average shooting in America, nothing special or mass about it. There are injured bystanders all the time, but apparently poor, inner-city people are less deserving of the media's attention. This is the kind of shooting that happens all over the country, every day. This is the kind of shooting we should focus on if we really want to save lives.
  • Jack DraigoJack Draigo
    But still... Chainsaws. A proper assault weapon should have a chainsaw mount.
    Nah, just have a chainsword in one hand, and a bolt pistol in the other, like Assault Marines do. Or are you suggesting Assault Marines don't know how to assault?
    No you have a chainsaw on the boltpistol AND a chain sword in the other hand!
  • lackofcheeselackofcheese
    edited January 2013
    No you have a chainsaw on the boltpistol!
    HERESY!
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • lackofcheeselackofcheese
    image
  • Jack DraigoJack Draigo
    Clearly as IE lost its share people got less frustrated and didn't want to kill each other so much. Clearly we need to ban IE.
  • GregGreg
    Didn't we already?
  • ChurbaChurba
    edited January 2013
    Since we've all seen the whole "Assault CUPS! Assault SPOONS! Assault CARS!" poster from the pro-gun side, here's something equally stupid and emotionally based.

    image

    In order, at the consumer level, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No. Literally every single one of these is less regulated than firearms at the consumer level, two of them are just left-wing policy hooks in a political, emotional version of the woo game.

    Some of them are a bit closer when you look at the manufacturing and sale side, rather than just the consumer level, but precisely zero regulations proposed by most anti-firearms proponents, including those with actual political power like Dianne "Gun saftey means muzzle sweeping the crowd, lol " Feinstein actually deal with manufacturers, only owners and retail sales - hell, they don't even stop appropriately licensed gunsmiths from buying the banned weapons, they just can't sell them.
    Post edited by Churba on
Sign In or Register to comment.