This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

Grand Prix Round 2 - Backgammon - UPDATED

1235721

Comments

  • No one ever taught me backgammon, nor did I EVER in my life see anyone playing it. Despite knowing it's a common game I just had no interest in learning because no one else cared to learn to play with me. Out of that list backgammon and othello (what the fuck is othello?) are the only two I don't know how to play.

    EDIT: I looked up othello, yeah I've never played that and have maybe seen it once in my life.
    I should have chosen Othello. Rym would have been much happier.
  • I've never heard the name othello, but I've heard Reversi
  • I've never heard the name othello, but I've heard Reversi
    Same thing.
  • edited March 2013
    I should have chosen Othello. Rym would have been much happier.
    If you wanted to make Rym happy, you would have chosen Advance Wars.
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • So, it's one thing to not regularly play backgammon. But seriously? It's hard to imagine someone who is at all interested in tabletop games not already knowing the rules to chess, checkers, backgammon, simple poker, othello, hearts, blackjack, and Chinese checkers by the time they're a teenager.

    How did backgammon fall off your collective radar? It's a basic, standard, classic, widely known game.
    Go belongs on that list far more than backgammon does.
  • RymRym
    edited March 2013
    Othello has effectively nonexistent positional heuristics for humans to use.

    I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    Post edited by Rym on
  • Othello has effectively nonexistent positional heuristics for humans to use.

    I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    Everyone has heard of Reversi, nobody has heard of Othello.
  • Othello has effectively nonexistent positional heuristics for humans to use.

    I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    Everyone has heard of Reversi, nobody has heard of Othello.
    Also sometimes known as Iago, like the bird in Alladin.
  • RymRym
    edited March 2013
    Othello has effectively nonexistent positional heuristics for humans to use.

    I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    Everyone has heard of Reversi, nobody has heard of Othello.
    Othello is the primary (and in most markets sole) brand name the game was ever sold under. Othello was the name of the game as it was licensed on videogame consoles like the NES and Atari 2600. Othello is the name of the tournament ruleset used worldwide. Othello refers to the modern, standard ruleset.

    "Reversi" was popularized relatively recently as a name for the game, primarily because "Othello" was implemented on computers but needed a non-trademark-infringing name. No one owned a trademark on "Reversi," which was at best a colloquial name for the obscure origin game that became Othello, so it could be used freely.

    The game was not well known until the 70s, when it was known as Othello. Reversi wasn't commonly used from that point until it appeared in shareware packs of little games on home PCs in the 90s.

    Othello existed, nominally called Reversi, before the 70s. But it was relatively obscure until it was branded and popularized, with rules standardization, as Othello.

    Go to any Toys R Us and look for "Reversi." You won't find it. You will find Othello.
    Post edited by Rym on
  • edited March 2013
    I always thought the name change was due to the US's hyper sensitivity to racism.
    Post edited by Dr. Timo on
  • If we're going to play a serious board game with each other, lets play some go.
  • RymRym
    edited March 2013
    I always thought the name change was due to the US's hyper sensitivity to racism.
    Heh.. Not a bad assumption. It would have passed the sniff test if I didn't already know the history of the game.

    But the name never changed. Reversi is just code for "non-licensed Othello clone."
    Post edited by Rym on
  • I've never heard the name othello, but I've heard Reversi
    Same thing.
    Yeah I know I looked it up :P
    I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    There's no need to be a dick about it, I've never heard about it. I honestly didn't play that many board games as a kid I played video games. Also that is a stupid comparison to ask about those other games.
  • I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    I'm pretty sure Geeknights was the source of me knowing about both Candyland and the Game of Life. Also Trouble was odd name for me, but one wikipedia search later it seems that I know it with another name.

  • I am amazed that someone on this forum would never have heard of "Othello" as a game. Honestly amazed. Have you heard of Monopoly? Trouble? Candyland?
    I'm pretty sure Geeknights was the source of me knowing about both Candyland and the Game of Life. Also Trouble was odd name for me, but one wikipedia search later it seems that I know it with another name.

    Which Game of Life? Conway's or baby car?
  • I had played Backgammon during some summer at 8 to 10 years old with my grandmother. I hadn't played since, and I never found it particularly exciting. I had to re-learn the rules and still: no passion.
  • edited March 2013
    I gained some passion when I realised the game was far less trivial than I expected. I'm also quite motivated to win this Grand Prix, especially given that I'm doing pretty well already.
    Post edited by lackofcheese on
  • Which Game of Life? Conway's or baby car?
    The board game. Canway's game of life I know and knew before listening Geeknigths.


  • If we're going to play a serious board game with each other, lets play some go.
    still: no passion.
    Agreed.
  • The problem with Go is that, at the low level (beginner play, which is what most people here will be doing), the game is basically random. There just aren't simple heuristics.

    Othello has a good set of directional heuristics (move pieces, don't expose a single piece, capture opponents' pieces if possible) and positional heuristics (I have more pieces further along).

    Novice Go players will act basically randomly for most of any given game.
  • Othello has a good set of directional heuristics (move pieces, don't expose a single piece, capture opponents' pieces if possible) and positional heuristics (I have more pieces further along).
    You mean backgammon, right?
  • I'd also find reason to get excited for some Chess.
  • I could do chess, though it has been quite a long time since I've played it.
  • There's also a lot more online options for chess.
  • The number of online options doesn't really matter, as long as there's at least one decent one.
  • I'm not opposed to Reversi. Learning to play Go better, priceless.
  • edited March 2013
    The number of online options doesn't really matter, as long as there's at least one decent one.
    It's nice to have options. It's a lot easier for me to find an app or something that allows me to play online multiplayer chess than backgammon. All I have found for backgammon on iOS so far is like weird shady apps where their netcode is shit or no one is using them. They're also run by sites that I've never heard of.

    EDIT: I guess Windows has internet backgammon. I might try that.
    Post edited by MATATAT on
  • Dammit, 32 new posts, I was SURE the postings were up!

    U guys...
  • When we do backgammon, I would like to do it with ios. There are lots of free apps using game center. You can make the moves on your own time and not have to be real time play. Also, you can have multiple games at the same time to make things faster.

    Obviously not everyone has ios but if we are self selecting opponents I would rather do game center.
  • edited March 2013
    Oh yeah, and chess/go would not be a good pick. I feel it would test more of "how long have you been playing that game" rather than "how good you are at games." Also, it is too easy to cheat at chess.

    Can't cheat in backgammon due to dice rolls.
    Post edited by iruul on
Sign In or Register to comment.