This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

The Official Friday Night Party Line Thread.

1101113151618

Comments

  • edited October 2011
    I had a ton of fun doing this episode. I also felt super-derp. First time nerves? More than likely.
    Post edited by WindUpBird on
  • Nah, I felt the same way. I didn't realize that was you on the line...
  • Nah, I felt the same way. I didn't realize that was you on the line...
    Yep!
  • edited October 2011
    I must admit, impressively fast turnaround on this episode, really good work dude. Also, Omar is gonna laugh pretty hard during this episode.
    Post edited by Churba on
  • edited November 2011
    It should be noted - There were 14 curses in this episode - making it the most curse-filled episode to date - With one by sonic, one by Scojo, and a full eleven and two halves(meaning, two mild curses) by me. I also Blasphemed thrice, grunted disapprovingly at Ron Paul and straight up insulted republicans and Ron Paul supporters.
    Post edited by Churba on
  • edited November 2011
    I stopped counting "shit" as a curse as I'm editing this podcast in accordance to common PG-13 standards. I do this for two reasons:
    1. I doubt anyone under 13 listens.
    2. Because "shit" is no longer vulgar in today's society.
    Post edited by Victor Frost on
  • I'm sure we were being descriptive. "That's crazy shit" right :-p
  • I stopped counting "shit" as a curse as I'm editing this podcast in accordance to common PG-13 standards. I do this for two reasons:
    1. I doubt anyone under 13 listens.
    2. Because "shit" is no longer vulgar in today's society.
    Oh, I'm not critiquing the bleep technique, I just counted everything up for laughs - and shit is still a curse, even though it's not as vulgar as it once was. It's a PG-13 acceptable Curse.
  • Man this show used to be classy, then you let people like me on it :-p
  • Once I remember to be on and life doesn't get in the way, I'll classy the motherfucking shit out of this summabitch.
  • I'm comfortable with my role of making everyone else look good.
  • Honestly, I think it's a waste of time to be censoring it at all.
  • If I don't censor it at all then I have to give it the explicit tag on on iTunes.
  • If I don't censor it at all then I have to give it the explicit tag on on iTunes.
    GeekNights has no explicit tag. Also we don't really hold back.
  • Honestly, I think it's a waste of time to be censoring it at all.
  • If I don't censor it at all then I have to give it the explicit tag on on iTunes.
    What are the disadvantages of having an explicit tag?
  • edited November 2011
    If I don't censor it at all then I have to give it the explicit tag on on iTunes.
    What are the disadvantages of having an explicit tag?
    Practically none. It's little more than being like the parental advisory stickers you used to get on CDs, except nobody is mandating or enforcing their use - nothing is changed from a copy of the cd that doesn't have the sticker, it's just a content advisory.

    From itunes -
    itunes:explicit

    This tag should be used to indicate whether or not your podcast contains explicit material. The three values for this tag are "yes", "no", and "clean".

    If you populate this tag with "yes", an "explicit" parental advisory graphic will appear next to your podcast artwork on the iTunes Store, and in the Name column in iTunes. If the value is "clean", the parental advisory type is considered Clean, meaning that no explicit language or adult content is included anywhere in the episodes, and a "clean" graphic will appear. If the explicit tag is present and has any other value (e.g. "no") you see no indicator — blank is the default advisory type.
    Post edited by Churba on
  • The last Mad Bull 34 episode of Fast Karate has no explicit tag. Draw your own conclusions.
  • edited November 2011
    What are the disadvantages of having an explicit tag?
    Practically none. It's little more than being like the parental advisory stickers you used to get on CDs, except nobody is mandating or enforcing their use
    You realize that no one mandates or enforces their use on CDs either, right? It's a totally arbitrary decision made by the record label of whether to include it or not. In fact, the real incentive for using the parental content warning sticker is that it actually boosts album sales because kids and pre-teens most want to hear the "bad" music they're not "supposed" to hear.
    Post edited by Sail on
  • So they can "stick it to the man" as the kids say these days.
  • edited November 2011
    What are the disadvantages of having an explicit tag?
    Practically none. It's little more than being like the parental advisory stickers you used to get on CDs, except nobody is mandating or enforcing their use
    You realize that no one mandates or enforces their use on CDs either, right? It's a totally arbitrary decision made by the record label of whether to include it or not. In fact, the real incentive for using the parental content warning sticker is that it actually boosts album sales because kids and pre-teens most want to hear the "bad" music they're not "supposed" to hear.
    Of course I don't, because for the most part we don't have them, to the best of my knowledge, I can only pick up what is told to me by others on the topic. The only ones I've seen personally are ones which are included in the cover art from American artists.

    Our rating system isn't great, but at least we don't have fuckin' wowsers going around sticking silly little "There's bad things in this!" stickers on things. Though, interestingly, we do have warnings on some programs that say "The people in this program at the time of showing may be deceased." or words to that affect, mostly on programs including aboriginal people - because in aboriginal culture, you don't speak the names of the dead, as a mark of respect, and that apparently extends to film and photos.

    Post edited by Churba on
  • Man this show used to be classy, then you let people like me on it :-p
    Have no fear Scott. There is still plenty to go before the show hits rock-bottom. I am trying hard though to get my hands on the steering wheel and find the Mariana Trench of podcasting.

    So when's the next episode being recorded?
  • Special Early Release! Episode 49 - "Adam's Great Planetary Pinball"

    With special guest Varoujan Gorjian, Astronomer for NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratories.
  • Wow, if I would have known that we had someone from JPL, I would have tried to escape from the family invasion to participate.
  • I'm sad I missed this one too. I was caught up in some work business that kept me too late to make it home in time.
  • Sonic, everything starting from the thanksgiving food discussion is just your monologue. Can't hear the guests. And ask the astronomer part is kinda boring to listen when you don't hear the questions or the astronomer himself.
  • Sonic, everything starting from the thanksgiving food discussion is just your monologue. Can't hear the guests. And ask the astronomer part is kinda boring to listen when you don't hear the questions or the astronomer himself.
    Sweet jeebus, no idea what happened there. The file is being re-uploaded as we speak.
  • The bloopers at the end are definitely worth listening to as well. We talk about Santa being a starter god, Muppets, and Adam's "Me-isms".
  • edited November 2011
    At the 67min mark, it seems that we only get your audio sonic. Oh crap, forgot to refresh and read before posting, sorry...
    Post edited by MrRoboto on
  • It might have been because I was listening to the Earlier upload, but the audio for this episode was choppy as fuck. I know it's not really your fault, but there has to be a way around it, though I don't know what it is.
Sign In or Register to comment.