The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I believe that the founding fathers would have written the constitution differently if they knew that technology could have given them so many fun, convenient ways of spying on their constituents. Living document and all that.
In all seriousness, between this and all the drone drama, my only concern is the possibility that the line between the government's treatment of US citizens and foreigners may be eroding. I can't say if it is or will, but of all these modern paranoias I find that one the most justifiable.
I plead that you make your jokes understandable to foreigners.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
I plead that you make your jokes understandable to foreigners.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Well, the US has been at war for the last decade so good luck pleading the third...
Which it isn't. The Third isn't about protecting privacy, it's about not forcing civilians to give up their resources to shelter and feed soldiers. This was actually a serious problem during the 17th and 18th centuries. There would be lowered fertility rates and greatly increased mortality rates whenever soldiers occupied a city -- even without imposing martial law. I was pleading the third just because I always plead it when someone else pleads any amendment. It's my favorite amendment.
Also, technically we haven't been at war since 1945.
Which it isn't. The Third isn't about protecting privacy, it's about not forcing civilians to give up their resources to shelter and feed soldiers. This was actually a serious problem during the 17th and 18th centuries. There would be lowered fertility rates and greatly increased mortality rates whenever soldiers occupied a city -- even without imposing martial law. I was pleading the third just because I always plead it when someone else pleads any amendment. It's my favorite amendment.
Also, technically we haven't been at war since 1945.
I was completely on board with what Snowden was doing - seemed like whistleblowing done right - until he started talking to the Chinese paper and mentioning specific computers the NSA was hacking. Don't provide help to our biggest, non-democratic rival.
As for the NSA itself, it's necessary but it needs to be scaled back. For example, make phone providers keep a complete database of phone records, but only turn over those that are specifically requested. Figure out a way to put more transparency into the approval system, starting with congress getting off its lazy ass and doing something. Briefings have been available for years, but it's only this week that most of them are learning about it.
Comments
Also, technically we haven't been at war since 1945.
As for the NSA itself, it's necessary but it needs to be scaled back. For example, make phone providers keep a complete database of phone records, but only turn over those that are specifically requested. Figure out a way to put more transparency into the approval system, starting with congress getting off its lazy ass and doing something. Briefings have been available for years, but it's only this week that most of them are learning about it.