I'm almost afraid to ask, but has he sent you anything about how O-bummer's gonna take over the US with the military and institute martial law to get a third term, using operation Jade Helm as a cover?
...
I wish I could share the absolute insanity that went down in my workplace over this but I can't. I'll just say that the cameras on my house have been turned back on for the first time in years (first installed them when construction crews across the street were dumping waste on our property) and will be on for the foreseeable.
Heinrich Mueller 4 August, 2015, 06:27 As I have said before, Donald Trump is acting to eliminate all the other Republican candidates except Jeb Bush. Donald will be handsomely rewarded for his work by the next President. The Republican Party will not nominate Donald Trump no matter how popular he might become. The die has already been cast, and Jeb Bush will be nominated, period. Now Donald is not going to make himself look like a bad guy and run as an Independent. It probably wouldn’t even be necessary. Jeb will lose on his own accord. There are not enough Republicans, Independents and Crossover Democrats that would vote for Jeb Bush. Someone else will run as an Independent if Hillary’s numbers get dangerously low, or they may run any way just to make sure she wins. Someone that is really a RINO, like McCain. Hillary will be elected, that’s a given. That was decided a long, long, long, time ago. You cannot have a Republican House and Senate and a Republican President. That would destabilize the country and lead to anarchy. You have to have gridlock constantly, so that all legislation has to be watered down to pass. That is, legislation that would actually do something to fix the problems that this county has, Instead, you get legislation that is filled with hidden agendas that represent only the ELITE and their Master Plan, There are plenty enough illegal’s and Morons to vote to really help out too. And don’t forget the Voting Dead from Chicago. If he can help at all, I am sure George Soros will change a few votes when they are sent to his Company in Spain to be tallied. The Rubicon was crossed by Obama with his fifth column army, and Queen Hillary (Veni, vidi, vici), will be crowned the first and maybe last leader of the New World Order. From O’ Fortuna: Fortune rota volvitur: descendo minoratus; alter in altum tollitur; nimis exaltatus rex sedet in vertice caveat ruinam! nam sub axe legimus Hillary reginam.
Even the Koch Bros. empire and their elite Republican donors are distancing themselves from Trump, but do you think he cares. It would be very wise for one or two of the other candidates to latch on to Trump’s messages. However, that may be too late as I think all of them have burned bridges.
Some people are getting very nervous: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Jon Corzine, to name just a few. And I know why.
I wrote a book titled “The Murder of the Middle Class” about the unholy conspiracy between big government, big business and big media. They all benefit by the billions of dollars from this partnership, and it’s in all of their interests to protect one another. It’s one for all and all for one.
It’s a heck of a filthy relationship that makes everyone filthy rich — everyone except the American people. We get ripped off. We’re the patsies. But for once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. I’ve never seen them this outraged, this vicious, this motivated or this coordinated. Never in all my years in politics have I seen anything like the way the mad dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.
When white supremacist David Dukes ran for governor of Louisiana , even he wasn’t treated with this kind of outrage, vitriol and disrespect. When a known fraud, scam artist and tax cheat like Al Sharpton ran for president, I never saw anything remotely close to this. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened like never before.
Why? Duke was never going to win. Sharpton was never going to win. Ron Paul was never going to win. Ross Perot was never going to win as a third-party candidate. Those candidates either didn’t have or couldn’t spare the billion dollars it takes to win the presidency. But Donald Trump can self-fund that amount tomorrow and still have another billion left over to pour into the last two-week stretch run before Election Day.
No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart.
It’s no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy The Donald. No, this is a coordinated conspiracy led by President Barack Obama himself. Obama himself is making the phone calls and giving the orders; he’s the ultimate intimidator who plays by the rules of Chicago thug politics.
Why is this so important to Obama? It’s because most of the other politicians are part of the “old boys club.” They talk big, but in the end they won’t change a thing. Why? They are all beholden to big-money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations and multinational corporations like Big Pharma or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock, stock and barrel by foreigners like George Soros owns Obama or foreign governments own Hillary with their Clinton Foundation donations.
These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But there’s one man — and only one man — who isn’t beholden to anyone. There’s one man who doesn’t need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the teachers union, or the Service Employees International Union, or the bar association to fund his campaign.
Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn’t need anyone’s help.
That means he doesn’t care what the media says. He doesn’t care what the corporate elites think. That makes him very dangerous to the entrenched interests. That makes Trump a huge threat. Trump can ruin everything for the bribed politicians and their spoiled slave masters.
Don’t you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama? Don’t you wonder why John Boehner and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama? Don’t you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to defund Obamacare or Obama’s clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens? Bizarre, right? It defies logic, right?
Well, first, I’d guess many key Republicans are being bribed. Secondly, I believe many key Republicans are being blackmailed. Whether they are having affairs, or secretly gay, or stealing taxpayer money, the National Security Agency knows everything.
Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew he was withdrawing large sums of his own money from his own bank account. Trust me: The NSA, the SEC, the IRS and all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They know everything.
Thirdly, many Republicans are petrified of being called “racists.” So they are scared to ever criticize Obama or call out his crimes, let alone demand his impeachment.
Fourth, why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you’re a “good boy,” you’ve got a $5 million-per-year lobbying job waiting.
The big-money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose,they win.
But Trump doesn’t play by any of these rules. Trump breaks up this nice, cozy relationship between big government, big media and big business. All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the presidency. The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides — but not Trump.
Remember: Trump is the guy who publicly questioned Obama’s birth certificate. He questioned Obama’s college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university.
Now, he’s doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do. He’s questioning our relationship with Mexico; questioning why the border is wide open; questioning why no wall has been built across the border; questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes yet are not deported; and questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.
Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick. Good question.
I’m certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare website.
By the way, that tab is now up to $5 billion.
Trump will ask if Obamacare’s architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. He will ask if Obama himself committed fraud when he said, “If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it.”
Trump will investigate Obama’s widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama’s college records.
Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election.
How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?
Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop this. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Trump could wake a sleeping giant.
Trump’s election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute. He will not hesitate. Once Trump gets in and gets a look at “the cooked books” and Obama’s records, the game is over. The gig is up. The goose is cooked.
Holder could wind up in prison. Jarrett could wind up in prison. Obama bundler Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money. Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails, or for accepting bribes from foreign governments while secretary of state, or for “misplacing” $6 billion as the head of the State Department, or for lying about Benghazi.
The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison. Obamacare will be defunded and dismantled. The Obama crime family will be prosecuted for crimes against the American people. And Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters.
Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved — just for fun. That will all happen on Trump’s first day in the White House.
Who knows what Trump will do on Day 2?
That’s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump. ~ Wayne Allyn Root
Our lord and savior Donald Trump, huh? If it were a conspiracy I'd argue that it would be more likely that he was either running as the crazy dude to make the Jeb Bush or the other Republicans look good, Or on the other hand be there to take away votes from the Republican Nominee/ Be an easy win against the Democrat Nominee.
PLUTOCRACY: A plutocracy is a country or society governed by the wealthy few.
To prevail in the Democratic primaries, Senator Sanders needs to have at least one million, dedicated supporters take the Bernie or Bust pledge. Skeptics are right to ask, “why?” Please read at least down to “A melodramatic analogy.”
Chris Hedges, a prominent left-wing voice, has said that Sanders “has agreed that he will endorse the [Party nominee], which, unless there is some miracle, will probably be Hillary Clinton.” [emphasis added] Noam Chomsky, perhaps the best known left-wing commentator has said, “I am glad that he’s [running for President,] “But the chances of [Senator Sanders] winning at the primary, or even at the national level, are virtually nil in our system, which is not a democracy but a plutocracy.” [emphasis added]
“Some miracle.” Why would Hedges and Chomsky say those things? In the United States 96% of the time the candidate spending the most money wins the campaign for office. Not including her billionaire-funded super PAC, Hillary Clinton already has tripled Bernie’s fundraising. Despite decreasing leads in many critical primary states, Secretary Clinton still commands a substantial lead in the national polls. Still not convinced of the need for the Bernie or Bust pledge? According to CNN, only 2% of Democratic voters think Sanders has the best chance of winning the general election.
It is ahistorical and naive for Sanders’ supporters to believe that he can secure the nomination for the Democratic Party without leverage to breakthrough the Clinton juggernaut. What kind of leverage? Try to imagine if a million or more American voters take the Bernie or Bust pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders in the general election. Democratic Primary voters and caucus goers will have to support Bernie Sanders or they will divide the American liberal/progressive left and potentially put a Republican in the White House. If taken by enough citizens, the Bernie or Bust pledge will give them no choice but to support Senator Sanders…or else. #BernieOrElse
The Bernie or Bust pledge is as simple as it will be effective. It involves two easy steps, and both are vital to the success of this movement’s strategy. They are:
1) Join thousands of voters who have filled out a simple form to pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders for President in 2016 no matter what. With enough leverage, Revolt Against Plutocracy can shock the Democratic Party establishment — in the news media and with ads — into understanding that nominating anyone else seriously jeopardizes Democrats keeping the White House. This massive lever will apply enough pressure to deter voter support for a regressive, establishment candidate like Hillary Clinton.
2) Pledge-takers will then reach out to friends, relatives, etc. to recruit just two more people to take the Bernie or Bust pledge within a week. This is the only way a critical mass will pool resources to maximize support by liberal and moderate Democrats for Sanders as President.
Please use email or Facebook messaging to widen the Bernie or Bust pledge movement while staying otherwise active on social media. If every pledge-signer recruits just two more citizens who recruit two more every week, we will reach 1,000,000 pledge-takers by next year. That’s a big number yet it starts with just two more pledges recruited by what must be a grassroots movement. It is important that pledge-takers persist and follow-up with potential recruits until two more pledges are confirmed to you. We will follow up all pledges with an email to forward to people.
A melodramatic analogy: No doubt, some skeptics will wonder if the Bernie or Bust pledge is like the wildly desperate guy–aiming a loaded pistol at his own head–who declares, “if I don’t get my way, I’ll pull the trigger.” That is like the Bernie or Bust pledge. You are a Sanders supporter. The threat to “pull the trigger” is the refusal to vote for a status quo Democrat even if it pushes a Republican in the White House. Leverage is how a minority effectively pressures the majority to meet their demands for a new way forward, that is, for tax reform, systemic change and democratic equality.
Six states do not allow for write-ins of candidates: Hawaii, Nevada, South Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Louisiana. While voters in those states will not be able to fulfill their pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders for President in 2016, taking the pledge will still convey to Democrats that hundreds of thousands or more people will not take another candidate. Write-ins from those states will contribute to the leverage we can apply to the primaries and caucuses next year.
Wall Street backs Hillary Clinton Wall Street backs Hillary Clinton Senator Bernie Sanders has called for a “political revolution.” Pledge-takers are taking a revolutionary step. A write-in pledge is a revolutionary innovation, and it will change how progressive, grassroots supporters will peacefully ignite an American revolution against oligarchy, against the corporate-state, against plutocracy, against “Wall Street capitalism”…against Wall Street-backed Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Republicans.
For more information, see the FAQ page, read Revolution, check out our revolutionary agenda and investigate the activists involved with Revolt Against Plutocracy. To get involved beyond the minimum two steps needed, be the media. See SPREAD THE WORD for suggestions on getting more than two people to take the Bernie or Bust pledge. We all are the revolution.
To all pledge-takers and petition-signers, thank you! Part of our social media strategy is #BernieOrBust and #BernieOrElse.
To everyone else, remember: there is a difference between a campaign for office and a political revolution. Bernie Sanders may well lose his campaign for the Democratic Party nomination. We are convinced only a revolutionary movement that will not take “Clinton” for an answer can secure his nomination. Think about it.
I find it adorable that they think one million people in the general election would make a bit of difference. The last time a socialist seriously ran for president (kinda) was in 1920, when Debs, running from prison, got just under a million votes, which was 3.4% of the electorate at the time. See how much of a difference that made?
One million people is roughly 0.3% of the US population. Even US elections are decided by larger margins than that, although the only margins that really matter are in Ohio and Florida.
Since I told my dad I was undecided in the Democratic primary I've started to receive the E-mails he's been getting from the Republican friends mostly about Bernie. I figure he figures I'm thinking about Bernie the most. Funny how this E-mail talks Democrats in a positive light... lol..
"Bernie Sanders’ father was a high school drop-out, who tormented his family with rants about their financial problems. He blamed society and economic inequality for his plight, though as a white male in a middle class neighborhood, he was hardly among the downtrodden.
This was Bernie’s inspiration to take up the cause of economic justice, though he would spend half of his life as an able-bodied college graduate living off of unemployment checks, and the women in his life, between odd jobs. By his own admission, Bernie was not a great student, starting at Brooklyn College and transferring to the Univ. of Chicago, but his enrollment kept him protected from the draft.
He joined socialist organizations and dabbled in far-left communist politics, gaining national notoriety by petitioning the school to let students have sex in the dormitories. This was before birth control and abortion were legal, when there were still very serious repercussions for women if the condom broke, but that didn’t stop him from crusading against those silly rules that were an obstacle to his own satisfaction. He participated in the 1963 March on Washington, a few demonstrations, and was arrested once, but his activism for civil rights ended when he became obsessed with socialism. NOT “democratic socialism”, but oppressive far-left Marxism.
Bernie married his college sweetheart, Deborah Shilling, and spent his small inheritance on a summer home in Vermont on 85 acres. The shack had a dirt floor and no electricity, maintaining his proletariat credibility, but not impressing his new bride. He refused to get a steady job, so his wife didn’t stick around long, and divorced him after 18 months.
The Viet Nam war was escalating, and when the next draft was announced, Bernie applied for a conscientious objector deferment. His deferment was denied, so he dodged the draft by having a kid out of wedlock in 1969 with his new girlfriend, Susan Mott, even though he STILL wasn’t working, and had no way to support the child. By the time his draft number came up, he was too old to be drafted anyway. He continued to subsist on odd carpentry jobs and unemployment checks, and occasionally selling $15 articles, including the one about how women fantasize about gang rape. He still refused to get a steady job to support his child. His girlfriend left him.
In 1988 he married Jane Driscoll, and took a cold-war era honeymoon in communist USSR. His new wife supported Bernie financially through his many attempts to win a public office, and shared his radical leftist political views. They visited the pro-Soviet Sandinista Government in Nicaragua known for their human rights violations, support for anti-American terrorists, and the imprisonment and exile of opponents. Bernie blindly overlooked the carnage to stand with fellow socialists. They traveled to Cuba in hopes of meeting Bernie’s hero Fidel Castro, but access to him was denied.
Bernie Sanders managed not to hold a full-time job his entire life or vote in a single election, until he finally ran for Mayor of Burlington at the age of 40. After several failed elections, he finally won the office of Mayor of Burlington, VT, and eventually a Senate seat, which he has managed to keep off and on. For all of his years representing Vermont, Bernie Sanders passed a total of three bills, and two of them were for naming post offices.
He’s a draft-dodging deadbeat dad, a globe-trotting communist dilettante, and a petulant detractor of hard-working honorable Democrats. His one skill is yelling about how unfair the world is, and how everything SHOULD be. But he has no plans for how to make it happen, and no idea what goes on in the rest of the world or how to deal with problems overseas. His excuse for not having a foreign policy or national security plank in his platform: “I’ve only been campaigning for three months.”
His socialist friends are bitter about what they see as a betrayal of their values by Bernie’s pursuit of the Democratic nomination. His former wife and girlfriend run when they see reporters and will not speak to the press. Bernie’s past, including a brief stint living in a kibbutz in Israel is cloaked in secrecy. Former employees and coworkers describe him as hostile and belligerent. All of the Democrats in Vermont’s government have endorsed Hillary Clinton.
The people who know Bernie best cannot stand him. His supporters cannot explain how he is qualified to be president. As for his detractors, we can only watch in horror as this Nader 2.0 works an appalling act of sabotage on the Democratic Party."
Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture. THIS IS WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY: To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly. The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office. I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now. Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness. This is my take. Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why. Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him. Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces. He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction. Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents. Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue. Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating. It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, andDonald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation. These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black." The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me. Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively,and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it. Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.
I checked the E-mail, it's like that probably because it's a cut and paste job from a website when i looked into this, it's from a site that has Alan Keyes as it's main writer.. I.E. the person who was sacrificed to Obama in Illinois when he ran for Senate. I think that election was like 90 to 10 or something. Needless to say a bunch of quack-jobs.
Geee a Democrat at a Democratic Convention, next I'm going to get an E-mail that says they had their son purposely killed... *sigh*
This article is actually more TRUTHFUL than political.
This was Barack Obama with Khizr Khan's wife in 2009. She was not in her Muslim garb. And if you think they accidentally ended up at the DNC convention, think again. Khan is a Dem CON man, and prop of the Left. He's Muslim Brotherhood affiliated, and a professor who teaches and practices Sharia. (see photo attached)
What was Mr. Kahn's true reason for this speech? His son died 12 years ago in a war Mr. Trump did not agree with but Hillary did. Could the CLINTON FOUNDATION have anything to do with his speaking at the DNC?
Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. and he specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies, Khan wrote a paper called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries. Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law. Khan is also co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia).
The law firm (Hogan & Hartson and Lovells) for which Mr. Kahn worked just COINCIDENTALLY is also the law firm for the Royal Court of Saudi Arabia, the tax lawyers for Bill & Hillary Clinton (and the Clinton Foundation) and also where Loretta Lynch worked. In addition, they also represent a small tech firm in Denver, CO. (yes, the same little firm that "managed" Hillary's private server)
The COLLUSION AND CORRUPTION RUNS DEEPER THAN IMAGINABLE my friends!!! ...no wonder the media is falling all over itself to defend this man.
"if I put one fact in an email, clearly the rest of the paragraph must be unquestionably true!"
Side note, that former student of mine whom I unfriended on FB has started messaging me, the first is a video of "Louder with Crowder", a YouTube channel for noted know-nothing Steven Crowder, claiming to debunk climate change myths. It's full of cherry picked data, half-truths, false assertions, and mocking Bill Nye using out of context quotes and ad-hominem attacks.
Comments
I wish I could share the absolute insanity that went down in my workplace over this but I can't. I'll just say that the cameras on my house have been turned back on for the first time in years (first installed them when construction crews across the street were dumping waste on our property) and will be on for the foreseeable.
Sigh.
Heinrich Mueller 4 August, 2015, 06:27
As I have said before, Donald Trump is acting to eliminate all the other Republican candidates except Jeb Bush. Donald will be handsomely rewarded for his work by the next President. The Republican Party will not nominate Donald Trump no matter how popular he might become. The die has already been cast, and Jeb Bush will be nominated, period.
Now Donald is not going to make himself look like a bad guy and run as an Independent. It probably wouldn’t even be necessary. Jeb will lose on his own accord. There are not enough Republicans, Independents and Crossover Democrats that would vote for Jeb Bush. Someone else will run as an Independent if Hillary’s numbers get dangerously low, or they may run any way just to make sure she wins. Someone that is really a RINO, like McCain. Hillary will be elected, that’s a given. That was decided a long, long, long, time ago.
You cannot have a Republican House and Senate and a Republican President. That would destabilize the country and lead to anarchy. You have to have gridlock constantly, so that all legislation has to be watered down to pass. That is, legislation that would actually do something to fix the problems that this county has, Instead, you get legislation that is filled with hidden agendas that represent only the ELITE and their Master Plan,
There are plenty enough illegal’s and Morons to vote to really help out too. And don’t forget the Voting Dead from Chicago. If he can help at all, I am sure George Soros will change a few votes when they are sent to his Company in Spain to be tallied.
The Rubicon was crossed by Obama with his fifth column army, and Queen Hillary (Veni, vidi, vici), will be crowned the first and maybe last leader of the New World Order.
From O’ Fortuna:
Fortune rota volvitur:
descendo minoratus;
alter in altum tollitur;
nimis exaltatus
rex sedet in vertice
caveat ruinam!
nam sub axe legimus
Hillary reginam.
My dad just posted this on facebook
Even the Koch Bros. empire and their elite Republican donors are distancing themselves from Trump, but do you think he cares.
It would be very wise for one or two of the other candidates to latch on to Trump’s messages.
However, that may be too late as I think all of them have burned bridges.
Some people are getting very nervous: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Jon Corzine, to name just a few. And I know why.
I wrote a book titled “The Murder of the Middle Class” about the unholy conspiracy between big government, big business and big media. They all benefit by the billions of dollars from this partnership, and it’s in all of their interests to protect one another. It’s one for all and all for one.
It’s a heck of a filthy relationship that makes everyone filthy rich — everyone except the American people. We get ripped off. We’re the patsies.
But for once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. I’ve never seen them this outraged, this vicious, this motivated or this coordinated. Never in all my years in politics have I seen anything like the way the mad dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.
When white supremacist David Dukes ran for governor of Louisiana , even he wasn’t treated with this kind of outrage, vitriol and disrespect. When a known fraud, scam artist and tax cheat like Al Sharpton ran for president, I never saw anything remotely close to this. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened like never before.
Why? Duke was never going to win. Sharpton was never going to win. Ron Paul was never going to win. Ross Perot was never going to win as a third-party candidate. Those candidates either didn’t have or couldn’t spare the billion dollars it takes to win the presidency. But Donald Trump can self-fund that amount tomorrow and still have another billion left over to pour into the last two-week stretch run before Election Day.
No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart.
It’s no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy The Donald. No, this is a coordinated conspiracy led by President Barack Obama himself. Obama himself is making the phone calls and giving the orders; he’s the ultimate intimidator who plays by the rules of Chicago thug politics.
Why is this so important to Obama? It’s because most of the other politicians are part of the “old boys club.” They talk big, but in the end they won’t change a thing. Why? They are all beholden to big-money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations and multinational corporations like Big Pharma or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock, stock and barrel by foreigners like George Soros owns Obama or foreign governments own Hillary with their Clinton Foundation donations.
These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But there’s one man — and only one man — who isn’t beholden to anyone. There’s one man who doesn’t need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the teachers union, or the Service Employees International Union, or the bar association to fund his campaign.
Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn’t need anyone’s help.
That means he doesn’t care what the media says. He doesn’t care what the corporate elites think. That makes him very dangerous to the entrenched interests. That makes Trump a huge threat. Trump can ruin everything for the bribed politicians and their spoiled slave masters.
Don’t you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama? Don’t you wonder why John Boehner and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama? Don’t you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to defund Obamacare or Obama’s clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens? Bizarre, right? It defies logic, right?
Well, first, I’d guess many key Republicans are being bribed. Secondly, I believe many key Republicans are being blackmailed. Whether they are having affairs, or secretly gay, or stealing taxpayer money, the National Security Agency knows everything.
Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew he was withdrawing large sums of his own money from his own bank account. Trust me: The NSA, the SEC, the IRS and all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They know everything.
Thirdly, many Republicans are petrified of being called “racists.” So they are scared to ever criticize Obama or call out his crimes, let alone demand his impeachment.
Fourth, why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you’re a “good boy,” you’ve got a $5 million-per-year lobbying job waiting.
The big-money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose,they win.
But Trump doesn’t play by any of these rules. Trump breaks up this nice, cozy relationship between big government, big media and big business. All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the presidency. The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides — but not Trump.
Remember: Trump is the guy who publicly questioned Obama’s birth certificate. He questioned Obama’s college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university.
Now, he’s doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do. He’s questioning our relationship with Mexico; questioning why the border is wide open; questioning why no wall has been built across the border; questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes yet are not deported; and questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.
Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick. Good question.
I’m certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare website.
By the way, that tab is now up to $5 billion.
Trump will ask if Obamacare’s architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. He will ask if Obama himself committed fraud when he said, “If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it.”
Trump will investigate Obama’s widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama’s college records.
Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election.
How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?
Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop this. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Trump could wake a sleeping giant.
Trump’s election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute. He will not hesitate. Once Trump gets in and gets a look at “the cooked books” and Obama’s records, the game is over. The gig is up. The goose is cooked.
The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison. Obamacare will be defunded and dismantled. The Obama crime family will be prosecuted for crimes against the American people. And Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters.
Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved — just for fun. That will all happen on Trump’s first day in the White House.
Who knows what Trump will do on Day 2?
That’s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.
~ Wayne Allyn Root
https://citizensagainstplutocracy.wordpress.com/2015/07/22/bernie-or-bust-pledge-is-the-miracle-senator-sanders-needs-to-secure-party-nomination/
PLUTOCRACY: A plutocracy is a country or society governed by the wealthy few.
To prevail in the Democratic primaries, Senator Sanders needs to have at least one million, dedicated supporters take the Bernie or Bust pledge. Skeptics are right to ask, “why?” Please read at least down to “A melodramatic analogy.”
Chris Hedges, a prominent left-wing voice, has said that Sanders “has agreed that he will endorse the [Party nominee], which, unless there is some miracle, will probably be Hillary Clinton.” [emphasis added] Noam Chomsky, perhaps the best known left-wing commentator has said, “I am glad that he’s [running for President,] “But the chances of [Senator Sanders] winning at the primary, or even at the national level, are virtually nil in our system, which is not a democracy but a plutocracy.” [emphasis added]
“Some miracle.” Why would Hedges and Chomsky say those things? In the United States 96% of the time the candidate spending the most money wins the campaign for office. Not including her billionaire-funded super PAC, Hillary Clinton already has tripled Bernie’s fundraising. Despite decreasing leads in many critical primary states, Secretary Clinton still commands a substantial lead in the national polls. Still not convinced of the need for the Bernie or Bust pledge? According to CNN, only 2% of Democratic voters think Sanders has the best chance of winning the general election.
It is ahistorical and naive for Sanders’ supporters to believe that he can secure the nomination for the Democratic Party without leverage to breakthrough the Clinton juggernaut. What kind of leverage? Try to imagine if a million or more American voters take the Bernie or Bust pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders in the general election. Democratic Primary voters and caucus goers will have to support Bernie Sanders or they will divide the American liberal/progressive left and potentially put a Republican in the White House. If taken by enough citizens, the Bernie or Bust pledge will give them no choice but to support Senator Sanders…or else. #BernieOrElse
The Bernie or Bust pledge is as simple as it will be effective. It involves two easy steps, and both are vital to the success of this movement’s strategy. They are:
1) Join thousands of voters who have filled out a simple form to pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders for President in 2016 no matter what. With enough leverage, Revolt Against Plutocracy can shock the Democratic Party establishment — in the news media and with ads — into understanding that nominating anyone else seriously jeopardizes Democrats keeping the White House. This massive lever will apply enough pressure to deter voter support for a regressive, establishment candidate like Hillary Clinton.
2) Pledge-takers will then reach out to friends, relatives, etc. to recruit just two more people to take the Bernie or Bust pledge within a week. This is the only way a critical mass will pool resources to maximize support by liberal and moderate Democrats for Sanders as President.
Please use email or Facebook messaging to widen the Bernie or Bust pledge movement while staying otherwise active on social media. If every pledge-signer recruits just two more citizens who recruit two more every week, we will reach 1,000,000 pledge-takers by next year. That’s a big number yet it starts with just two more pledges recruited by what must be a grassroots movement. It is important that pledge-takers persist and follow-up with potential recruits until two more pledges are confirmed to you. We will follow up all pledges with an email to forward to people.
A melodramatic analogy: No doubt, some skeptics will wonder if the Bernie or Bust pledge is like the wildly desperate guy–aiming a loaded pistol at his own head–who declares, “if I don’t get my way, I’ll pull the trigger.” That is like the Bernie or Bust pledge. You are a Sanders supporter. The threat to “pull the trigger” is the refusal to vote for a status quo Democrat even if it pushes a Republican in the White House. Leverage is how a minority effectively pressures the majority to meet their demands for a new way forward, that is, for tax reform, systemic change and democratic equality.
Six states do not allow for write-ins of candidates: Hawaii, Nevada, South Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Louisiana. While voters in those states will not be able to fulfill their pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders for President in 2016, taking the pledge will still convey to Democrats that hundreds of thousands or more people will not take another candidate. Write-ins from those states will contribute to the leverage we can apply to the primaries and caucuses next year.
Wall Street backs Hillary Clinton
Wall Street backs Hillary Clinton
Senator Bernie Sanders has called for a “political revolution.” Pledge-takers are taking a revolutionary step. A write-in pledge is a revolutionary innovation, and it will change how progressive, grassroots supporters will peacefully ignite an American revolution against oligarchy, against the corporate-state, against plutocracy, against “Wall Street capitalism”…against Wall Street-backed Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Republicans.
For more information, see the FAQ page, read Revolution, check out our revolutionary agenda and investigate the activists involved with Revolt Against Plutocracy. To get involved beyond the minimum two steps needed, be the media. See SPREAD THE WORD for suggestions on getting more than two people to take the Bernie or Bust pledge. We all are the revolution.
If this pledge is too radical or scary for you, please sign our petition urging Senator Warren and the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus to publicly endorse Senator Sanders for President. https://www.change.org/p/senator-warren-and-the-progressive-caucus-endorse-senator-sanders-for-president
To all pledge-takers and petition-signers, thank you! Part of our social media strategy is #BernieOrBust and #BernieOrElse.
To everyone else, remember: there is a difference between a campaign for office and a political revolution. Bernie Sanders may well lose his campaign for the Democratic Party nomination. We are convinced only a revolutionary movement that will not take “Clinton” for an answer can secure his nomination. Think about it.
Funny how this E-mail talks Democrats in a positive light... lol..
"Bernie Sanders’ father was a high school drop-out, who tormented his family with rants about their financial problems. He blamed society and economic inequality for his plight, though as a white male in a middle class neighborhood, he was hardly among the downtrodden.
This was Bernie’s inspiration to take up the cause of economic justice, though he would spend half of his life as an able-bodied college graduate living off of unemployment checks, and the women in his life, between odd jobs. By his own admission, Bernie was not a great student, starting at Brooklyn College and transferring to the Univ. of Chicago, but his enrollment kept him protected from the draft.
He joined socialist organizations and dabbled in far-left communist politics, gaining national notoriety by petitioning the school to let students have sex in the dormitories. This was before birth control and abortion were legal, when there were still very serious repercussions for women if the condom broke, but that didn’t stop him from crusading against those silly rules that were an obstacle to his own satisfaction. He participated in the 1963 March on Washington, a few demonstrations, and was arrested once, but his activism for civil rights ended when he became obsessed with socialism. NOT “democratic socialism”, but oppressive far-left Marxism.
Bernie married his college sweetheart, Deborah Shilling, and spent his small inheritance on a summer home in Vermont on 85 acres. The shack had a dirt floor and no electricity, maintaining his proletariat credibility, but not impressing his new bride. He refused to get a steady job, so his wife didn’t stick around long, and divorced him after 18 months.
The Viet Nam war was escalating, and when the next draft was announced, Bernie applied for a conscientious objector deferment. His deferment was denied, so he dodged the draft by having a kid out of wedlock in 1969 with his new girlfriend, Susan Mott, even though he STILL wasn’t working, and had no way to support the child. By the time his draft number came up, he was too old to be drafted anyway. He continued to subsist on odd carpentry jobs and unemployment checks, and occasionally selling $15 articles, including the one about how women fantasize about gang rape. He still refused to get a steady job to support his child. His girlfriend left him.
In 1988 he married Jane Driscoll, and took a cold-war era honeymoon in communist USSR. His new wife supported Bernie financially through his many attempts to win a public office, and shared his radical leftist political views. They visited the pro-Soviet Sandinista Government in Nicaragua known for their human rights violations, support for anti-American terrorists, and the imprisonment and exile of opponents. Bernie blindly overlooked the carnage to stand with fellow socialists. They traveled to Cuba in hopes of meeting Bernie’s hero Fidel Castro, but access to him was denied.
Bernie Sanders managed not to hold a full-time job his entire life or vote in a single election, until he finally ran for Mayor of Burlington at the age of 40. After several failed elections, he finally won the office of Mayor of Burlington, VT, and eventually a Senate seat, which he has managed to keep off and on. For all of his years representing Vermont, Bernie Sanders passed a total of three bills, and two of them were for naming post offices.
He’s a draft-dodging deadbeat dad, a globe-trotting communist dilettante, and a petulant detractor of hard-working honorable Democrats. His one skill is yelling about how unfair the world is, and how everything SHOULD be. But he has no plans for how to make it happen, and no idea what goes on in the rest of the world or how to deal with problems overseas. His excuse for not having a foreign policy or national security plank in his platform: “I’ve only been campaigning for three months.”
His socialist friends are bitter about what they see as a betrayal of their values by Bernie’s pursuit of the Democratic nomination. His former wife and girlfriend run when they see reporters and will not speak to the press. Bernie’s past, including a brief stint living in a kibbutz in Israel is cloaked in secrecy. Former employees and coworkers describe him as hostile and belligerent. All of the Democrats in Vermont’s government have endorsed Hillary Clinton.
The people who know Bernie best cannot stand him. His supporters cannot explain how he is qualified to be president. As for his detractors, we can only watch in horror as this Nader 2.0 works an appalling act of sabotage on the Democratic Party."
Sylvia Thompson on Obama's "legacy"...
Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.
THIS IS WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY:
To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.
The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from
office.
I focus on
white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the
majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of
some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that
group.
Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.
Barack Obama's
sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was
founded
It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.
This is my take.
Obama's
nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a
Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.
Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.
Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add.
Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.
He could not
care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.
Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.
Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.
Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama
has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that
many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.
It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, andDonald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.
These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."
The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.
Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively,and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.
Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.
This article is actually more TRUTHFUL than political.
This was Barack Obama with Khizr Khan's wife in 2009. She was not in her Muslim garb. And if you think they accidentally ended up at the DNC convention, think again. Khan is a Dem CON man, and prop of the Left. He's Muslim Brotherhood affiliated, and a professor who teaches and practices Sharia. (see photo attached)
What was Mr. Kahn's true reason for this speech? His son died 12 years ago in a war Mr. Trump did not agree with but Hillary did. Could the CLINTON FOUNDATION have anything to do with his speaking at the DNC?
Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. and he specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies, Khan wrote a paper called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries. Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law. Khan is also co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia).
The law firm (Hogan & Hartson and Lovells) for which Mr. Kahn worked just COINCIDENTALLY is also the law firm for the Royal Court of Saudi Arabia, the tax lawyers for Bill & Hillary Clinton (and the Clinton Foundation) and also where Loretta Lynch worked. In addition, they also represent a small tech firm in Denver, CO. (yes, the same little firm that "managed" Hillary's private server)
The COLLUSION AND CORRUPTION RUNS DEEPER THAN IMAGINABLE my friends!!! ...no wonder the media is falling all over itself to defend this man.
Side note, that former student of mine whom I unfriended on FB has started messaging me, the first is a video of "Louder with Crowder", a YouTube channel for noted know-nothing Steven Crowder, claiming to debunk climate change myths. It's full of cherry picked data, half-truths, false assertions, and mocking Bill Nye using out of context quotes and ad-hominem attacks.