This forum is in permanent archive mode. Our new active community can be found here.

Star Wars: The Disney Era

1222325272838

Comments

  • image
    Riot Trooper breakout character of the year.
  • So what the fuck was that thing made off to stand up to a lightsaber? Why do I get the feeling the next Star Wars game will feature a lot of those troopers.
  • There's a few materials that are lightsaber resistant, like Cortosis and Phrik, but it is possible the magnetic field on the maul also helped to parry the lightsaber.
  • It looks a lot like the zappy staves (also lightsaber resistant) that the robots used in Episodes II and III.
  • I don't care what it's made of, that guy was legit. I agree that if Phasma had been in that role, no-one would be able to deny she is legit as fugg. But since she wasn't in that role, she was kinda meh and TR-8R gets to be memified.
  • My theory was that TR-8R had that thing in case Kylo Ren got out of control. Those guys with batons were to beat down out of control Sith wannabees, not resurgent Jedi.
  • This movie was dope and I'm not surprised by who didn't like it.
    image
  • Yeah it was pretty much a new new hope. I get why they went for a soft reboot though. My main complaint is just that they had lots of cool characters and things and not enough time with each of them. I think this is one case where an extended edition/director's cut would help a lot. I still really enjoyed it, it just felt like "hey guys look at all this cool shit we're introducing for future movies" rather than just a good first movie.
  • edited December 2015
    5, 4, 7, 6...
















































    3






    1






















    2
    Post edited by Andrew on
  • edited December 2015
    Andrew said:

    This movie was dope and I'm not surprised by who didn't like it.

    It's not that I didn't like it, I was entertained. But it was A New New Hope.

    EDIT: It's fine that it was safe. It's a children's movie, but I'm not the child I was when I saw the originals so it doesn't have the same impact.
    Andrew said:

    5, 4, 7, 6...

    That's fair, I'd put it on the same level as RotJ. Empire remains the stand out.
    Post edited by George Patches on
  • Chewie doing his wookiee thing at a library party across the state last night:



    Legs... still need work. I think I may make him a bit shorter because trying to get the contour right at 7'10" is just not working out. :-/
  • I like the idea of the Riot Tonfa, but doubling the length feels like that it would make absurdly unbalanced. I could see it working if he was swarmed by a mob of protesters. I don't really see it working against someone who's trained with a lightsaber. (The solution there would be to get more Riot Troopers.
  • So what's the moratorium on spoilers in this thread?
  • I mean I just assumed I shouldn't check it after the movie came out before I saw it.
  • So what's the moratorium on spoilers in this thread?

    If you haven't seen it by now, you're not nerdy enough to listen to GeekNights.
  • If you're going to write a blog post, just write a blog post. There's no way I'm reading that much text in comic form!
  • I like that theory
  • So here's my beef with this movie. Everything up to the Rey getting captured was pretty awesome, then out of nowhere we have the death planet (starkiller?). It's like they wrote a decent movie and then Disney demanded it had a death star sequence.
  • Definitely, the first half of the film was mostly good. Then Star Wars started shark jumping.
  • If you're going to write a blog post, just write a blog post. There's no way I'm reading that much text in comic form!
    Wait you're telling me there's a comic under all those word balloons?
  • So here's my beef with this movie. Everything up to the Rey getting captured was pretty awesome, then out of nowhere we have the death planet (starkiller?). It's like they wrote a decent movie and then Disney demanded it had a death star sequence.

    At least this Death Star did something different from the one in Jedi.
  • Raithnor said:

    So here's my beef with this movie. Everything up to the Rey getting captured was pretty awesome, then out of nowhere we have the death planet (starkiller?). It's like they wrote a decent movie and then Disney demanded it had a death star sequence.

    At least this Death Star did something different from the one in Jedi.
    Was more powerful not different enough? Never mind that at the point when you can blow up a planet, what's the point of more power?
  • Ugh I think Star wars does something to your brain, I am excited to see Star wars this morning as I was when I first was going to see it...
  • Raithnor said:

    So here's my beef with this movie. Everything up to the Rey getting captured was pretty awesome, then out of nowhere we have the death planet (starkiller?). It's like they wrote a decent movie and then Disney demanded it had a death star sequence.

    At least this Death Star did something different from the one in Jedi.
    Was more powerful not different enough? Never mind that at the point when you can blow up a planet, what's the point of more power?
    The Death Star II was basically 60% Bigger and the laser could be used on ships. Everyone thought the Death Star in RotJedi was a tired rehash and still is.

    Starkiller Base could destroy five separate planets 60,000 light years away and consume Stars as fuel.
Sign In or Register to comment.