A couple states like "compilation". There's a joke there but I havn't figured it out yet.
I love that NH and Montana's words are "compilation." As in I don't care what it is I'm watching, I just want one category of something played in a succinct group.
Yeah, not a cure. Still have the virus, still potentially transmissible. They are simply asymptomatic and not getting worse. (The baby is in the same boat - she may have a long, healthy life, but she will still need to take precautions about spreading the disease.) I want to see them do research on viability of the virus once transmitted to another host to see if it starts reproducing again or stays dormant. That would, of course, be unethical.
I want to see them do research on viability of the virus once transmitted to another host to see if it starts reproducing again or stays dormant. That would, of course, be unethical.
That didn't stop the MK-Ultra experiments, nor that bullshit they pulled in Nicaragua(?) for syphilis testing.
"because I think science can disprove god" is perhaps a little bit of an odd statement. Not all religions have gods. Also the "burden of proof" implies some kind of arrangement that doesn't make sense. Then saying "I have no reason to listen to you" na-na-na-na-na fingers in my ears running away...
Yo dog, I support your conclusion but I think your premises are a little unsound.
Which isn't inherently a bad thing, as it numbs them to the pain of this world; but it does create dependence. Karl Marx was discussing curing the disease (IE create a Marxist society where workers aren't exploited) rather than needing a drug for the symptoms (IE organized religion), as back then opiates were widely used in his time as painkillers and such.
And creamsteak yeah its a bit childish I admit, but in debates the burden of proof is on whoever makes the statement, not on the opponent to disprove the statement.
Sorry if this I a double post. Signal is wonky here...
I'm in the room as my dad has minor surgery. It's a bit surreal. I don't want to breath for fear of infecting him. I also cannot help but feel as if this is a peek into my future.
"because I think science can disprove god" is perhaps a little bit of an odd statement. Not all religions have gods.
That's the point. That statement is in the "this is not what I think" column.
Also the "burden of proof" implies some kind of arrangement that doesn't make sense. Then saying "I have no reason to listen to you" na-na-na-na-na fingers in my ears running away...
There is no precedent for conscious supernatural beings creating everything.
Yo dog, I support your conclusion but I think your premises are a little unsound.
Man, I am going to be savoring this in chunks for a while. I don't think I could watch this all in one sitting, but it's still awesome to see this kind of footage from that far back. The movies.com writeup describes it better than I can: "Keep in mind that setups for these films took far longer to compose than they do today, putting a lot of pressure on the actors to get things right the first time. It's still hilarious to watch the facade crack just a little."
"because I think science can disprove god" is perhaps a little bit of an odd statement. Not all religions have gods.
That's the point. That statement is in the "this is not what I think" column.
Also the "burden of proof" implies some kind of arrangement that doesn't make sense. Then saying "I have no reason to listen to you" na-na-na-na-na fingers in my ears running away...
There is no precedent for conscious supernatural beings creating everything.
Yo dog, I support your conclusion but I think your premises are a little unsound.
That's the point.
So the whole thing is supposed to be sarcastic, but it's someone elses thing of the day that doesn't get that?
Comments
Proud to be a Humanist Atheist.
Yo dog, I support your conclusion but I think your premises are a little unsound.
And creamsteak yeah its a bit childish I admit, but in debates the burden of proof is on whoever makes the statement, not on the opponent to disprove the statement.
I'm in the room as my dad has minor surgery. It's a bit surreal. I don't want to breath for fear of infecting him. I also cannot help but feel as if this is a peek into my future.
Anyway, best wishes for you and your dad.
Man, I am going to be savoring this in chunks for a while. I don't think I could watch this all in one sitting, but it's still awesome to see this kind of footage from that far back. The movies.com writeup describes it better than I can: "Keep in mind that setups for these films took far longer to compose than they do today, putting a lot of pressure on the actors to get things right the first time. It's still hilarious to watch the facade crack just a little."