My post also had a meta level of meaning because while at my friends birthday party I learned the existence of the destroyer series of books. I read a bit of one of the books and realized that while it was kinda bad it also was hilarious and entertaining enough that when I have a free spot I might borrow them from my friend and read 'em.
I argued so vehemently because I know that the squeaky wheel gets oiled, and too often the squeaky wheel is saying something dumb. That content creators still are able to retain enough freedoms to provide quality, intelligent entertainment to all demographics is a very important thing to me, on more than just one level.
But anyway, this episode gave me some laughs. At least she's not reading the Fillysitter's Club.
It's not too shabby. My only gripe is that AJ doesn't have a hat, Fluttershy's hair isn't what it should be, and RD's eyes look too soft. It should be the straight eyelash line and not the curved top.
While a title like "Reading Rainbow" probably wouldn't fly, "Reading Rainbow Dash" probably could. An example of something similar (by the same production company no less) would be the Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends episode "The Big Lebluski".
Just got into a random pub game of dungeon defenders with 3 other bronies. They were all 16, and today I learned that apparently the other major fandom in their age group was sonic the hedgehog? Why is that? Also apparently they can all spend their parents money freely on microtransaction bullshit.
Comments
Also.
Dear Princess Celestia.
Today I learned that even tough serialized pulp fiction might be literary crap, enjoyment can be found on their pages.
But anyway, this episode gave me some laughs. At least she's not reading the Fillysitter's Club.
It's not too shabby. My only gripe is that AJ doesn't have a hat, Fluttershy's hair isn't what it should be, and RD's eyes look too soft. It should be the straight eyelash line and not the curved top.
Since MLP and RR are both TV shows, the likelyhood of confusion would be quite high here. They'd never be able to argue legit use of the Trademark.